Case Summary
The suit for boundary fixation was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel had no instruction from the client and the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary fixation
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for boundary fixation. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. The name of the plaintiff called absent. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Areeparambil Hamza (56 years)
Puthupalli amsom & Post, Kalavoor desom, Pin: 676 102
Sulaikha (51 years)
Puthupalli amsom, Kooloor desom, Tirur Taluk
Hairuneesa (34 years)
Puthupalli amsom, Kooloor desom, Tirur Taluk
Aneesha (33 years)
Puthupalli amsom, Kooloor desom, Tirur Taluk
Ayisha (32 years)
Puthupalli amsom, Kooloor desom, Tirur Taluk
Muhammed Anwar (30 years)
Puthupalli amsom, Kooloor desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Ramadas.P.V (Not mentioned years)
Pandaravalappil House, Ezhuvathiruthi, Ponnani Post, Pin: 679 583
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Boundary Fixation
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
The suit for boundary fixation was dismissed.
Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. The name of the plaintiff called absent. Hence suit is dismissed.