Case Summary
Plaintiff filed suit for boundary fixation but the suit got dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Final Judgment
No
The suit for boundary fixation was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Machincheri Nafeesa
- Relation
- Wife of Ibarahim (Late)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Machincheri Hamza
- Relation
- Son of Moideenkutty (Late)
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Boundary Fixation
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff sought boundary fixation between the parties.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Machincheri Nafeesa et al vs Machincheri Hamza et al regarding boundary fixation
Case Code Year
Case between Machincheri Nafeesa et al vs Machincheri Hamza et al regarding boundary fixation