Case Summary
Plaintiff filed suit seeking boundary fixation and injunction. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was absent and had no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the suit with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for boundary fixation and injunction due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
No formal final order is present.
Judgment Evidence:
No formal final order is present.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Eingapadalil Kadeeja
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- Daughter of Ayamu Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chenganakattil Abdurahiman
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- Son of Kunhimohamed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Eingapadalil Aliyamu
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- Son of Kunheedutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ummatha Kutty
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- Wife of Kunheedutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nafeesa
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- Wife of Abdu Rahiman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- Daughter of Kunheedutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asharaf
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- Son of Kunheedutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ahammed
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- Son of Kunheedutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rayinkutty
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- Son of Kunhimoideen Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mammad
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- Son of Kunhimoideen Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sulaikha
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Junaid
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- Child of Chenganakattil Abdurahiman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sainul Abid
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Child of Chenganakattil Abdurahiman
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Boundary Fixation
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking boundary fixation
Evidence:
Not mentioned
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Seeking injunction
Evidence:
No representation. Hence suit is dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Eingapadalil Kadeeja et al vs Chenganakattil Abdurahiman et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Eingapadalil Kadeeja et al vs Chenganakattil Abdurahiman et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction