Case Summary
The suit involved the plaintiffs filing a suit for boundary fixation and injunction, which was eventually dismissed based on a lawful compromise agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed based on a lawful compromise agreement.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Suit for fixation of boundary and Injunction. Compromise IA. 1933/2016 is filed. It is seen that the terms of the compromise is lawful. Hence suit is dismissed as per the terms of the compromise.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for fixation of boundary and Injunction. Compromise IA. 1933/2016 is filed. It is seen that the terms of the compromise is lawful. Hence suit is dismissed as per the terms of the compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vadkumpurath Palliyalil Santhakumari
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- D/o. Pullanoor Balakrishnan Nair
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vadkumpurath Palliyalil Beena
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- D/o. Pollanoor Balakrishnan Nair
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vadakumpurath Palliyalil Sreeja
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- D/o. Pullanoor Balakrishnan Nair
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vadakumpurath Palliyalil Beenesh
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o. Pullanoor Balakrishnan Nair
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thudimmal Abbas
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o. Moideenkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thudimmal Muhammed Rafi
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o. Moideen
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valiya Kalanthan Kottarath Noushad @ Baba
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o. Muhammadali
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Applicable
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Request for boundary fixation and injunction
Evidence:
Suit for fixation of boundary and Injunction. Compromise IA. 1933/2016 is filed. It is seen that the terms of the compromise is lawful. Hence suit is dismissed as per the terms of the compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Boundary Fixation and Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vadkumpurath Palliyalil Santhakumari et al vs Thudimmal Abbas et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vadkumpurath Palliyalil Santhakumari et al vs Thudimmal Abbas et al regarding boundary fixation and injunction