Case Summary
Geetha Surendran seeks court intervention to prevent encroachment and construction on her property by Kuriakose @ Kuriachan.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil
Final Judgment
No
Geetha Surendran's injunction request to halt construction on her property's southern boundary was granted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The defendant/respondent and his men and agents is temporarily restraining from constructing any boundary walls in the southern side of the plaint A schedule property, until further orders.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Geetha Surendran
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kuriakose @ Kuriachan
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction against construction of boundary wall
Evidence:
Respondent restrained from constructing boundary wall
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes petitioner's title and possession
Reference:
2563/1993
Document Type:
Photographs/sketches
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows alleged encroachment and foundation work by respondent
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Geetha Surendran W/o Surendran vs Kuriakose @ Kuriachan S/o Paulose regarding boundary dispute and injunction relief
Case Code Year
Case between Geetha Surendran W/o Surendran vs Kuriakose @ Kuriachan S/o Paulose regarding boundary dispute and injunction relief