Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 29/2019

Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Ranjitha Nidheesh et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd, is seeking the recovery of a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on repayments. The suit was brought about after repeated demands for payment were ignored by the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants are liable to pay the plaintiff the amount of Rs. 81,000 along with interest, due to their default in repaying the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay the amount of Rs. 81,000 along with 12% per annum as interest from the date of the suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendants are liable to pay the plaintiff the amount of Rs. 81,000 along with interest, due to their default in repaying the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and proved the defendants' liability to repay the loan.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was unchallenged and proved the defendants' liability to repay the loan.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 along with the documents marked as Ext.A1 to A7, in the absence of any contra evidence proves the case of the plaintiff that the defendants are liable to pay the amount due.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The defendants are hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 81,000/- along with 12% per annum as interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manojkumar
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajan A.U.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ranjitha Nidheesh
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anil C.
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindu P.C.
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ambika Chellappan
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand promissory note, Loan agreement, Office copy of lawyer notice, Returned registered cover with acknowledgment cards, Resolution dated 06.07.2018, Resolution dated 10.01.2023, Copy of certificate of registration.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blesson Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.V. Eldho
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the amount of Rs. 81,000/- along with interest.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby directed to pay the amount of Rs. 81,000/- along with 12% per annum as interest from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's claim by showing the loan agreement between the plaintiff and the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms of the loan availed by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as evidence that a notice was issued to the defendants regarding the loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Returned Registered Cover with Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These documents provide proof that the notice sent to the defendants was duly received.
Reference:
Ext.A4 series
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document signifies the authorization of the manager to initiate the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further supports the management's decisions related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of Certificate of Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the legal status of the plaintiff company.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Ranjitha Nidheesh et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Ranjitha Nidheesh et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Basil Paul et al regarding recovery of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won