Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 14/2019

Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Basil Paul et al regarding recovery of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises and its partners, filed a suit against the defendants for the recovery of money related to defaults in chitty payments. The case revolves around chitty transactions initiated by the plaintiffs and the defendants' failure to pay the agreed installments.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the defendants to pay Rs. 5,40,000 with interest for the defaults in chitty payments. The defendants were also held liable for all costs associated with the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 5,40,000 along with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the defendants to pay Rs. 5,40,000 with interest for the defaults in chitty payments. The defendants were also held liable for all costs associated with the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs successfully proved the defendants' liability to pay the amounts due under the chitty agreements.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs successfully proved the defendants' liability to pay the amounts due under the chitty agreements.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 read along with Ext. A1 to A10 proves the chitty transaction of the defendants with the 1st plaintiff firm and auctioning of the same by the defendants, receipt of amount as per Ext. A5 to A10 and the default in paying the same.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and the defendants are hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 5,40,000 along with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum, till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valsala Mukundan
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Tony
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Basil Paul
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paulose
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Eliyamma
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Chitty guarantee agreements, receipts, lawyer notices, certificate of registration.
Defendants Documents
Reconstitution deed.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Joseph Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A.M. John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anand Omanakuttam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to recover Rs. 5,40,000 along with interest.
Evidence:
The defendants are hereby directed to pay an amount of Rs. 5,40,000 along with interest at the rate of 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature and circumstances of the case, the plaintiffs are entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Chitty Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pertaining to the chitty No. 75 with statement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Chitty Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pertaining to the chitty No. 75 with statement No. 6.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Chitty Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pertaining to the chitty No. 75 with statement No. 260.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Chitty Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pertaining to the chitty No. 75 with statement No. 259.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Chitty Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Pertaining to the chitty No. 75 with statement No. 10.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt showing the receipt of amount of Rs. 2,70,000 on auctioning the chitty No. 75.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt related to chitty transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt related to chitty transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt related to chitty transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original receipt related to chitty transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of lawyer notice demanding the repayment of amount.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of acknowledgment card received on service of notice.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Certificate of Registration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of certificate of registration issued by register of firms.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of judgment in O.S No. 450/15.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Form B Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Form B notice submitted.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Form F Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Form F statement of registration of establishment submitted.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Reconstitution Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of reconstitution deed.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Basil Paul et al regarding recovery of money.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Basil Paul et al regarding recovery of money.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd et al vs Ranjitha Nidheesh et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won