Case Summary
The plaintiffs, M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are members of the Youth Wing of 'Lok Tantric Janata Dal', for obstructing access to the plaintiffs' development project in Ernakulam. The defendants staged protests claiming illegal activities by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from causing any obstruction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, issuing a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent any obstruction to the plaintiffs' project. The defendants were also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their case with unchallenged evidence that the defendants had no legal right to obstruct the plaintiffs' property.
The plaintiffs established their case with unchallenged evidence that the defendants had no legal right to obstruct the plaintiffs' property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their case with unchallenged evidence that the defendants had no legal right to obstruct the plaintiffs' property.
The plaintiffs established their case with unchallenged evidence that the defendants had no legal right to obstruct the plaintiffs' property.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that plaintiffs have established their case. The apprehension of plaintiffs are well founded and in the absence of any denial evidence, I am satisfied that plaintiffs are entitled for a decree.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from causing any kind of obstruction for the plaintiffs officers, staff, contractors, vehicles, customers for their free and peaceful ingress and egress to the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Purva Realties Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Puravankara Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayesh
- Party Age
- 30
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Varghese
- Party Age
- 45
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suresh
- Party Age
- 35
Plaintiffs Documents
Letter of authorization dated 16.06.2025, Letter of authorization dated 28.05.2025, Letter of authorization dated 20.06.2025, Photographs evidencing demonstrations on 06.03.2023, True copy of judgment in WP (C) No.40021/2022 dated 17.06.2025.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jolly John
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Liza Meghan Cyriac
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Irene Babu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abilash Bhaskar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Binu John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Alex Thannippilly
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from causing any kind of obstruction for the plaintiffs’ officers and staff.
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from causing any kind of obstruction for the plaintiffs officers, staff, contractors, vehicles, customers for their free and peaceful ingress and egress to the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from conducting demonstrations against the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from any kind of demonstrations including but not limited to dharna, meetings, slogans, signages etc against the plaintiffs within 100 meters on either side of the plaint schedule property on the national highway bye-pass side (western).
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiffs.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Letter of Authorization
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document shows authorization from the board for the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Letter of Authorization
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document shows authorization from the board for the second plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Letter of Authorization
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document shows authorization from the board for the third plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Photographs and Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document provides evidence of demonstrations and obstructions caused by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
True Copy of Judgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document presents a legal judgment relevant to the plaintiffs' claims.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.