Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. No. 244 / 2023 — Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1125/2024
Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leena Sham has filed a suit against YouTube and her daughter, Sharikka Sham, seeking a permanent injunction to remove a video uploaded by her deceased son. The video is claimed to violate her privacy and has caused distress to the family after the son's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 626 /2022
Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Aseeb, a senior citizen, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing his access to a pathway that he claims is essential for ingress and egress to his property. The defendants, relatives of the plaintiff, contest the existence of the claimed pathway and the plaintiff's rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 995 / 2019
Case between Suresh Babu T vs Kiran M B et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Suresh Babu T, filed a suit against Kiran M B and Grace Cheriyan for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent his forcible eviction from a leased property. The plaintiff claims he invested significantly in his business and fears illegal dispossession by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 571 / 2020
Case between M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP, filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, seeking protection against eviction and service disruption. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent during the COVID-19 pandemic and the plaintiff's apprehension of unlawful eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 563/2025
Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.
Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 5 41/2019
Case between Varghese P Itoop vs Alliance residency owner's association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Varghese P Itoop, is the owner of two commercial shop rooms and is involved in a dispute with the Alliance residency owner's association regarding the unauthorized removal of hoardings placed on his property. The association contends that the plaintiff violated their bye-laws, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 136/2018
Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
Garden View Apartment owners Association filed a restoration petition after their suit was dismissed for default when they failed to appear for trial. The court considered the circumstances and allowed the restoration subject to a cost being paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 954/2024
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
Mrs. Julie Sebastian filed a suit against SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. The matter was reported settled, and both parties agreed to the terms of mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 913/2022
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. as the plaintiff and Kalamassery Municipality as the defendant. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.1240/2024
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
The case involves M/s Indo Quartz as the plaintiff and M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. and others as defendants. The plaintiff filed a petition under Order 38 Rule 5, claiming that the defendants intended to withdraw funds to defeat a potential decree against them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.892/2021
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Shanoj R, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Joseph Augustin and Lenin Joseph, to prevent them from destroying a sacred serpent grove. The defendants had been allegedly trespassing and causing damage to the grove, which has been in existence for over 1000 years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 30/2023
Case between Louis Anthony vs Nebu @ Chackochan regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
Louis Anthony, the plaintiff, is seeking a legal remedy for the fixation of boundary and an injunction against the defendant, Nebu @ Chackochan, who is allegedly trying to trespass into the plaintiff's property. The case has raised issues related to property valuation and the right of the plaintiff over the concerned property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 367/2018
Case between Manoharan vs Ramadas regarding mandatory injunction to vacate property
The plaintiff, Manoharan, and the defendant, Ramadas, are brothers involved in a dispute over the ownership and possession of a property in Kadamakkudy Village. The plaintiff seeks a mandatory injunction to vacate the property, claiming that the defendant, who was allowed to reside in a shed on the property, has overstayed and caused disturbances.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 617/2024
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries, is suing the defendant, M/s. Kureekode Agencies, for outstanding payments for electrical and mechanical commodities supplied. The defendant has failed to pay despite acknowledging the bills.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 917/2018
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
The case involves M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries suing M/s. Ambatt Electricals for unpaid dues from supplied commodities. The plaintiff claims the defendant owed them a total amount of Rs. 48,245, which includes interest and legal costs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1467/2019
Case between Sri. Mathew George vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding a civil suit
Sri. Mathew George filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority. The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence, leading to the case being dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 647/2022
Case between All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham vs Salimon K P regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, represented by T M Ramanan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Salimon K P, who is attempting to act as an office bearer of the All Travancore Sri Padmanabha Vilasam Hindu Cheramar Mahajana Sangham. The court evaluated the claims and evidence presented by both parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 628/2023
Case between Young Men's Arts & Cultural Association vs K.U.Bhava et al regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Young Men's Arts & Cultural Association, was not represented during the hearing, while the defendants were present. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1154/2020
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
The plaintiff, M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd., is seeking recovery of ₹1,24,000 from the defendant, Tapovan Impex Private Limited, for services rendered. The defendant failed to appear in court, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 676/2022
Case between Arimpoor Francis Jose et al vs Rone Infotrade Private Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The plaintiffs, including Arimpoor Francis Jose and others, filed a suit against Rone Infotrade Private Limited and its directors. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiffs not presenting ex-parte evidence despite multiple chances.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 487/2025
Case between Khel Badminton Academy et al vs Ernakulam District Badminton (shuttle) Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
The plaintiffs, including Khel Badminton Academy and others, brought a suit against the Ernakulam District Badminton Association and its representatives. The suit was not pressed and was subsequently dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1319/2024
Case between Dhibu Paul et al vs Ravishankar regarding parking rights
Dhibu Paul and others filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against Ravishankar and others concerning the use of parking spaces. The court clarified an earlier order allowing the petitioner to park in a designated area as long as it does not obstruct the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 758/2024
Case between Abdul Salam M. A. vs Abida M. A. et al regarding declaration and partition of property
This case involves a dispute over the partition of property among siblings and a maternal uncle presumed dead. The plaintiff filed for property division according to Muslim succession laws.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 536/2025
Case between AC Candlewood Apartment Owners Association vs Robin D'Coutho regarding default dismissal of suit.
The AC Candlewood Apartment Owners Association filed a suit against Robin D'Coutho. The plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented in court, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1170/2022
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
Nikhil.N. Asher, the plaintiff and Managing Partner of Kumud Enterprises, filed a suit against the firm Plymart and its partners for the recovery of an outstanding amount. The defendants acknowledged the debt but failed to make the remaining payment despite multiple requests.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 917/2022
Case between Noor Muhammed Noorsha vs Jacobite Syrian Christian Fellowship et al regarding not pressed suit
Noor Muhammed Noorsha is the plaintiff against Jacobite Syrian Christian Fellowship and Mathew. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S. No. 1283/2022
Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiffs are M/s. Thoppil Fincorp, represented by its proprietor T.V. Thomas, who is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants Navas A.A and Sheeba Navas. The defendants took a loan of Rs. 75,000 but failed to repay the outstanding amount of Rs. 46,868 along with interest.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1021/2024
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Abdul Vahab E regarding supply of steel rods
M/s PromoteN, a partnership firm, supplied steel rods to Abdul Vahab E, a building contractor. The plaintiff seeks to recover the value of the supplied materials due to a billing error and a shortage in the returned materials.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 337/2024
Case between Thomas P Mathew vs M/s Movie World Visual Media Private Limited et al regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves Thomas P Mathew as the plaintiff against M/s Movie World Visual Media Private Limited and others. The plaintiff was absent for the hearings, leading to the court's dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 413/2023
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, M/s M D George and Company, asserts ownership of property and seeks recovery of unpaid rent from the defendant, M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd., along with a mandatory injunction to remove their machinery from the premises. The defendant failed to appear in court and was set exparte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1607/2019
Case between Baby Francis vs A.K. Devasya et al regarding non prosecution of suit
The case involves Baby Francis as the plaintiff and A.K. Devasya along with other defendants. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case further.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1045/2024
Case between M/s. RDC CONCRETE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs M/s EIS IDEAL CONSTRUCTION INDIA Pvt. Ltd et al regarding dismissal of suit
M/s. RDC CONCRETE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. filed a suit against M/s EIS IDEAL CONSTRUCTION INDIA Pvt. Ltd and its directors. The plaintiff submitted that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 168/2020
Case between Whisper Generator Sales & Services Private Ltd. vs Beena Sajeev regarding dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Whisper Generator Sales & Services Private Ltd., filed a suit against the defendant, Beena Sajeev. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no proof affidavit or petition for adjournment was filed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
O.S. No. 996/2023
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, M/s Foryes Associates, is seeking recovery of an outstanding amount from the defendants, M/s. Home Centre and Mr. Arun. The case involves claims of unpaid dues for kitchen products purchased on credit, which the defendants failed to settle despite multiple extensions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 932/2025
Case between I.D.Michael vs Soumya Mary Zacharia et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
I.D.Michael, an 80-year-old plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Soumya Mary Zacharia and others to prevent them from trespassing onto his property. The dispute arises from an ongoing family conflict involving property and matrimonial issues related to the plaintiff's son and the first defendant.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won