Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 487/2025

Case between Khel Badminton Academy et al vs Ernakulam District Badminton (shuttle) Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Khel Badminton Academy and others, brought a suit against the Ernakulam District Badminton Association and its representatives. The suit was not pressed and was subsequently dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the suit was not pressed and therefore dismissed it. The matter was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the suit was not pressed and therefore dismissed it. The matter was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was not pressed by the plaintiffs, leading to its dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was not pressed by the plaintiffs, leading to its dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was not pressed by the plaintiffs, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Khel Badminton Academy
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sincere Sports and Arts Club
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Treesa Garden Badminton Academy
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vypin United Club
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ernakulam District Badminton (shuttle) Association (EDBSA)
Relation
Represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adv. Russel S
Relation
Returning officer, Ernakulam District Badminton Shuttle Association
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jyothy K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. T Jestin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Khel Badminton Academy et al vs Ernakulam District Badminton (shuttle) Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Khel Badminton Academy et al vs Ernakulam District Badminton (shuttle) Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won