Case between Dhibu Paul et al vs Ravishankar regarding parking rights

Case Summary

Dhibu Paul and others filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction against Ravishankar and others concerning the use of parking spaces. The court clarified an earlier order allowing the petitioner to park in a designated area as long as it does not obstruct the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The petitioner's request for clarification on parking rights was granted. The petitioner may park in the designated area as long as it does not interfere with the plaintiffs' parking.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

No

The petitioner's request for clarification on parking rights was granted. The petitioner may park in the designated area as long as it does not interfere with the plaintiffs' parking.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The earlier court order was deemed sufficient for granting limited access to the petitioner.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The earlier court order was deemed sufficient for granting limited access to the petitioner.

Supporting Evidence

The petitioner contends that by the modified order dated 06.02.2025 in IA No. 1/2024, this Court permitted to use the plaint B schedule property, provided such use does not obstruct the plaintiffs' peaceful use of their respective allotted parking spaces.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed thereby clarifying the order in IA No. 1/2024 dated 06.02.2025 thereby permitting the petitioner to park his vehicle in the plaint B schedule property subject to the strict compliance of order dated passed in IA No. 1/2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Dhibu Paul

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Asharudheen P.S

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Febin Francis

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M.K.C.Nair

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Ravishankar
Relation: S/o Late Siva Shankar

Plaintiffs Documents

Title documents showing their rights to car parking in the Plaint B schedule property.

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Latha Anand
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: K.K. Sajikumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Adarsh C.P.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Liju V. Stephen
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Indu Susan Jacob
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Abhijith
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Clarifying the order in IA No. 1/2024 to permit the petitioner to park his vehicle in the plaint B schedule property subject to compliance with the order.

Evidence: