Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 996/2023

Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration
2 years 13 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s Foryes Associates, is seeking recovery of an outstanding amount from the defendants, M/s. Home Centre and Mr. Arun. The case involves claims of unpaid dues for kitchen products purchased on credit, which the defendants failed to settle despite multiple extensions.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit is dismissed due to being barred by law of limitation. The plaintiff failed to file the suit within the stipulated time frame despite multiple opportunities given to the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is dismissed due to being barred by law of limitation. The plaintiff failed to file the suit within the stipulated time frame despite multiple opportunities given to the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was filed beyond the period of limitation as defined by law.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was filed beyond the period of limitation as defined by law.
Supporting Evidence
The suit is seen filing much belatedly after the period of limitation. Hence the suit is barred by law of limitation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. Considering the fact that the defendants remained exparte to the proceedings, there is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Foryes Associates
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mrs. Sudha TR
Relation
W/o. P.B. Dineshkumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Home Centre
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Arun
Relation
Partner/Authorized signatory
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of invoice dated 17.10.2018, Copy of invoice No. 631 dated 19.10.2018, Copy of invoice No. 642 dated 22.10.2018, Copy of notice dated 08.12.2018, Copy of notice dated 18.02.2019, Copy of notice dated 01.03.2019, Original postal receipt dated 03.01.2020, Copy of Lawyer's notice dated 01.10.2021, Original postal receipt dated 01.10.2021
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.G. Manoj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Sarath Prasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover the amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
Thus the suit is seen filing much belatedly after the period of limitation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the purchase of products on credit by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the purchase of products on credit by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the purchase of products on credit by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of notice sent to defendants for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of notice sent to defendants for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of notice sent to defendants for payment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that a lawyer's notice was sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of lawyer's notice sent demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that a notice was sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Original acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of receipt of notices sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that a notice was sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Original acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of receipt of notices sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Foryes Associates vs M/s. Home Centre et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Leo Tourism and Lifespace Developers Pvt. Ltd. vs The CSB Bank Ltd. regarding mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Arun Paul Alex vs Purva Eternity Apartment Owner's Association regarding temporary injunction and maintenance charges
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s Conpac Mix Pvt. Ltd. vs Faizal regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Maya Printers vs Sandhya Anil regarding realization of money.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s PromoteN vs Basheer regarding money recovery
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won