Case Summary
Sri. Mathew George filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority. The plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence, leading to the case being dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence after multiple adjournments.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sri. Mathew George
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Greater Cochin Development Authority
- Relation
- represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil S. Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anila Peter
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Radhika Rajasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sajen Thampan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sudheesh S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shiva Sharath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aniyan P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Priya Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sri. Mathew George vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sri. Mathew George vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding a civil suit