Similar Cases
Based on: Restor.Pt 3523/2015 — Case between Shanavas vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. et al regarding restoration application
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
EP 486/2012
Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Noushad et al regarding financial settlement
The case involved a financial settlement dispute where the respondent, Noushad-R1 and Abdu-R2, paid the full amount resulting in the recording of full satisfaction and closure of the Execution Petition.
Execution Proceeding
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89 OF 2016
Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.
Indus Towers ltd. filed a suit against Muhammed Abdul Khadar for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant obstructed their access to their mobile telephone infrastructure on the defendant's property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 252 OF 2016
Case between Subhash et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding money realisation
Plaintiff handed over Rs.9,00,000 to defendants for jewellery business profits but was not paid. Court decreed defendants to pay Rs.9,96,378 with interest.
Civil Suit - Money Realisation
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 97 OF 2017
Case between Shaji vs Thunchath Jewellers et al regarding money realization
Plaintiff Shaji filed a suit against Thunchath Jewellers and others seeking realization of money borrowed with gold security and alleging breach of agreement terms by the defendants.
Civil Suit - Money Realization
Plaintiff Won
S.T.No:12/2018
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Dr. Senthilkumar regarding Offence under N.I. Act.
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd filed a complaint against Dr. Senthilkumar for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant later sought permission to withdraw the complaint, which was granted by the court.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
Restor.Pt 348/2014
Case between Meleppat Muhammedkutty Master vs Kunnath Sree Prakashan regarding restoration petition
Petitioner, a 72-year-old individual, filed a restoration petition against the respondent in the Munsiff Magistrate court at Tirur, Malappuram.
Civil Case - Restoration Petition
Restor.Pt 1484/2014
Case between Komalesan-P1 vs Kunhappan alias Appa-R1 regarding restoration petition
Petitioner Komalesan filed a restoration petition against the respondent Kunhappan alias Appa for which an interim application was allowed on the condition of paying Rs.4000/- cost to the respondent by 22-8-14.
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Restor.Pt 983/2014
Case between Paroor Appu Nair vs Munhakkal Amina et al regarding restoration petition
Paroor Appu Nair filed a restoration petition against Munhakkal Amina and Munhakkal Sabeer regarding certain conditions.
Restoration Petition
Restor.Pt 3158/2014
Case between Muhammed Master vs Saidalavi regarding restoration of suit
Muhammed Master filed a petition seeking restoration of a suit, which was allowed by the court.
Unknown
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 2885/2014
Case between Muhammed Musthafa vs Valappil Kunheemu Umma regarding restoration of suit
Petitioner Muhammed Musthafa filed a petition to restore a suit, which was allowed by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 2409/2014
Case between Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath vs Mujeeb.P regarding restoration of decree
Thirunavaya Grama Panchayath filed a petition seeking restoration of a decree which was set aside by the court.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 505/2016
Case between Kunhimuhammed vs Abdulla regarding restoration of suit
Petitioner Kunhimuhammed filed for restoration of suit which was allowed by the court as no representation or counter was filed by the respondent Abdulla.
Civil Suit - Restoration
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 1314/2017
Case between Kolencheri Ganeshan vs Koloth Valappil Thankamani regarding restoration petition
Petitioner Kolencheri Ganeshan filed a restoration petition seeking permission to contest the matter and obtain a decree on merit, which was allowed by the court after paying costs.
Restoration Petition
Partial
Restor.Pt 1746/2017
Case between Ullirithody Nisar vs Suresh Babu regarding restoration petition
Petitioner Ullirithody Nisar filed a restoration petition against Respondent Suresh Babu, which was allowed by the Munsiff Magistrate at Tirur, Malappuram.
Civil Case
Plaintiff Won
EP 159/2012
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Nazeer Chenmala et al regarding default petition
Thennala Service Co-op.Bank filed a default petition against Nazeer Chenmala and others, which was later dismissed for default.
Default Petition
Defendant Won
EP 98/2013
Case between Secretary vs Shamsudheen et al regarding default petition
The Secretary of Thirunavaya Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. filed a default petition against Shamsudheen and others which was dismissed for default.
Default Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 1191/2013
Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Petitioners filed a restoration petition against respondents, seeking relief.
Restoration Petition
EP 362/2012
Case between The Secretary vs Kattil Peediyekkal Musthafa regarding Default Judgment
The Secretary filed a petition against Kattil Peediyekkal Musthafa seeking enforcement of a decree, but the petition was dismissed due to non-payment for issuing an arrest warrant.
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Defendant Won
EP 451/2012
Case between Othukkungal Panchayath Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Melath Fakrudheen et al regarding default judgment
The Othukkungal Panchayath Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. filed a petition against Melath Fakrudheen and others seeking a decree, which was dismissed for default as the petitioner did not represent and did not pay batta for arrest warrant against R3.
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Defendant Won
EP 232/2013
Case between The Valavannur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs Vattaparambil Hamza et al regarding default in notice issuance
The Valavannur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. filed a petition against multiple judgment debtors for default in paying notice issuance fees, resulting in the dismissal of the petition.
Default Petition
Defendant Won
EP 435/2012
Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. vs Kunhimuhammed regarding default petition dismissal
The Kunnamkulam Financing Company Ltd. filed a default petition against Kunhimuhammed, which was dismissed by the Munsiff Magistrate due to non-payment of batta.
Civil Suit - Default Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 142/2014
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Petitioner Achuthan filed a restoration petition against respondents Kali, Balan, and Kunha, seeking relief which was dismissed by the court for non-deposit of cost.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn/302423/2013
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
A restoration petition was filed by Kunheevi against the respondents seeking some remedy.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn/302421/2013
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Petitioner Muhammedkutty filed a restoration petition against respondent Kunhimon which was allowed on the condition to pay costs of Rs.5000 by 30-5-14.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 627/2014
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Petitioner T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett filed a restoration petition against respondent Thekkumpurath Sulaikha.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 628/2014
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Kuvvaparambath Bhaskaran regarding restoration petition
Petitioner T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett filed a restoration petition seeking relief to pay Rs.5000 to respondent.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 351/2014
Case between Poppat Prakash Lakshman Jadav vs Suchetha regarding restoration petition
Poppat Prakash Lakshman Jadav filed a restoration petition against respondent Suchetha, which was granted by the court.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 180/2014
Case between Padikkaparambil Vasumathi alias Mani vs Sreekurumba Bhagavathi Temple Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding restoration petition
Petitioner filed a restoration petition against the respondents, involving payment of cost of Rs.4000 by a specified date.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 837/2014
Case between Parangodan vs Krishnan et al regarding restoration petition
Parangodan filed a restoration petition against Krishnan and others for failure to take steps to implead legal representatives of deceased R2 and to issue notice to R3.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 181/2014
Case between Narayanan et al vs Satheesh Chandran alias Unni regarding restoration petition
Restoration petition filed by petitioners against respondent for which IA was allowed on condition to pay costs to the respondent.
Restoration Petition
EP 172/2013
Case between Edathadathil Sainaba vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding default judgment
Edathadathil Sainaba filed a case against Muhammed Abdul Noor, seeking a judgment in their favor. The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to produce necessary documents.
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Defendant Won
EP 167/2013
Case between Apparambil Husain vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding default judgment
Apparambil Husain filed a case against Muhammed Abdul Noor for default judgment, seeking enforcement of a decree.
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 208/2014
Case between Chembeettil Gangadharan et al vs Kappattakath Valiyil Abduraheem regarding restoration petition
Multiple petitioners filed a restoration petition against the respondent, granted with a condition to pay costs to the respondent.
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 278/2014
Case between Chittakath Karthuveettil Ayisakutty et al vs Kottayil Kunhipocker et al regarding cost payment
Petitioners sought time for paying costs, but the court dismissed the petition as the cost was not paid.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 179/2014
Case between Pathiyil Aboobacker vs Nellikkal Muhammedali regarding restoration petition
The petitioner filed a restoration petition which was allowed conditionally on payment of costs to the respondent.
Restoration Petition
Partial
Restor.Ptn 205/2014
Case between Appunni et al vs Suresh Kumar et al regarding Restoration Petition
Appunni and others filed a restoration petition against Suresh Kumar and others, seeking relief granted on payment of costs as ordered by the court.
Restoration Petition
Restor.Ptn 207/2014
Case between Muraleedharanunni vs Chandran regarding restoration petition
Petitioner, Muraleedharanunni, filed a restoration petition against respondent, Chandran, and was allowed to proceed on condition of paying costs.
Restoration Petition
Partial
Restor.Ptn 206/2014
Case between Muraleedharanunni vs Narayanan regarding restoration petition
Muraleedharanunni filed a restoration petition against Narayanan, leading to an order allowing the petition on the condition of paying Rs.500 as costs.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
EP 132/2013
Case between Secretary vs M. Krishnan et al regarding Default Judgment
The case involves the Secretary of Thirunavaya Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. as the Decree Holder against M. Krishnan, M. Vettan, and M. Thami as Judgment Debtors for default judgment.
Default Judgment
Defendant Won
EP 236/2013
Case between Suresh Babu vs Hamza regarding default judgment
Suresh Babu, the decree holder, filed a case against Hamza, the judgment debtor, for non-payment resulting in default judgment.
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 836/2014
Case between Hamza vs Rukhiya regarding restoration petition
A case involving a restoration petition filed by Hamza against Rukhiya where the petitioner was allowed to proceed after paying a cost to the respondent.
Restoration Petition
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Ptn 786/2014
Case between Aminu vs Hassan et al regarding dismissal for default
Aminu filed a restoration petition against multiple respondents for non-representation. The petition was dismissed for default due to lack of notice issued to the respondents.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
EP 287/2013
Case between Secretary vs Chettiyamparambil Assainar kutty et al regarding default judgment
The Secretary of The Valavannur Service Co-operative Bank Limited filed a petition against Chettiyamparambil Assainar kutty and Sunil Kumar for default judgment which was dismissed.
Default Judgment
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 01244/2013
Case between Mammad et al vs Fathimma et al regarding restoration petition
Petitioners sought restoration with a condition to deposit cost of Rs. 4000.
Restoration Petition
Restor.Ptn 831/2014
Case between Marathingal Kunhimon vs Marathingal Alikutty regarding unknown matter
Restoration petition filed by petitioner Marathingal Kunhimon against respondent Marathingal Alikutty was dismissed due to payment of costs.
Unknown
Defendant Won
EP 36/2014
Case between Secretary-in Charge vs Chemmanoor Radhakrishnan regarding default judgment
The Secretary-in Charge of Kurumbathur Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. filed a petition against Chemmanoor Radhakrishnan which was dismissed for default due to non-representation and non-payment of necessary fees for issuing arrest warrant and notice.
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Defendant Won
EP 79/2014
Case between The Secretary vs Neerkattil Moideenkutty regarding default judgment
A petition by The Valavannur Service Co-operative Bank against Neerkattil Moideenkutty was dismissed for default as the legal heirs of the deceased respondent were not impleaded despite several opportunities.
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Defendant Won
Restor.Ptn 164/2014
Case between Pariyarath Kunhikkammu et al vs Amina Sindhu et al regarding restoration petition
A restoration petition filed by the petitioners against the respondents was allowed by the court on the condition of paying costs to different respondents.
Restoration Petition