Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn 164/2014

Case between Pariyarath Kunhikkammu et al vs Amina Sindhu et al regarding restoration petition

Court
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Sri. Sanu C, B.sc, LLM
Order Date
2014-08-16
Duration
0 years, 7 months, 26 days
Case Code No.
164
Case Closed
Sat, 08/16/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A restoration petition filed by the petitioners against the respondents was allowed by the court on the condition of paying costs to different respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The petition was allowed with the condition to pay costs to specific respondents.
Judgment Favored
Petitioner
Relief Granted
Allowing the restoration petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed with the condition to pay costs to specific respondents.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.3000/- to R1,2,4 and 5 jointly Rs.1000/- each to R3 and 5 on or before 16-8-14.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pariyarath Kunhikkammu
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pariyarath Suhara
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amina Sindhu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muneer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.M.Abdul Jabbar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salahudheen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.C.Abdulla
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jotheendrakumar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nazir Ahamed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration of petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowing the restoration petition
Evidence:
Petition is allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.3000/- to R1,2,4 and 5 jointly Rs.1000/- each to R3 and 5 on or before 16-8-14.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 01/16/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/16/2014 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2014 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Unknown
Case between Achuthan vs Kali et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Thekkumpurath Sulaikha regarding restoration
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T.Vijayakumar Takur Sing Sett vs Kuvvaparambath Bhaskaran regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Poppat Prakash Lakshman Jadav vs Suchetha regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won