Case Summary
Petitioner Achuthan filed a restoration petition against respondents Kali, Balan, and Kunha, seeking relief which was dismissed by the court for non-deposit of cost.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition as the petitioner failed to deposit the required cost of Rs.5000/-.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
IA allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.5000/- on or before 5-4-2014 vide order in separate sheet. Cost not deposited. IA dismissed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Achuthan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kali
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kunha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Granted
Description:
Filing of restoration petition dismissed due to non-deposit of cost
Evidence:
IA allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.5000/- on or before 5-4-2014 vide order in separate sheet. Cost not deposited. IA dismissed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2014