Case Summary
A restoration petition was filed by Kunheevi against the respondents seeking some remedy.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition with costs paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Cost paid IA allowed
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid IA allowed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kunheevi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hyder Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A.Ismail
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath-R1
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restore the petition
Evidence:
Cost paid IA allowed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Kunheevi vs Puthiyakath Kinattingal Ramlath et al regarding restoration petition