Case Summary
Petitioner Muhammedkutty filed a restoration petition against respondent Kunhimon which was allowed on the condition to pay costs of Rs.5000 by 30-5-14.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed with a condition to pay costs, which were duly paid before the specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is allowed vide order in separate sheet on condition to pay cost of Rs.5000/- to R29 on or before 30-5-14. Cost paid IA allowed
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kalarikkal Kunhimon
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the original petition
Evidence:
Petition is allowed vide order in separate sheet on condition to pay cost of Rs.5000/- to R29 on or before 30-5-14. Cost paid IA allowed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Kalarikkal Muhammedkutty vs Kalarikkal Kunhimon regarding restoration petition