Case Summary
Petitioner Kolencheri Ganeshan filed a restoration petition seeking permission to contest the matter and obtain a decree on merit, which was allowed by the court after paying costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Partial
Relief Granted
Permission to contest the matter and obtain a decree on merit
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by the petitioner to contest the matter and obtain a decree on merit by condoning the inconvenience faced by the respondent's counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
Hence IA stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2500/- and for payment. Cost paid. Hence IA allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kolencheri Ganeshan
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koloth Valappil Thankamani
- Party Age
- 50
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrashekaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Not mentioned
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permission to contest the matter and obtain a decree on merit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration petition allowed by the court for the petitioner to contest the matter and obtain a decree on merit by paying costs.
Evidence:
Hence IA stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2500/- and for payment. Cost paid. Hence IA allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PT
Case Code Year
2017