Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn 208/2014

Case between Chembeettil Gangadharan et al vs Kappattakath Valiyil Abduraheem regarding restoration petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Sri. Sanu C, B.sc, LLM
Order Date
2014-06-18
Duration
0 years, 5 months, 3 days
Case Code No.
208
Case Closed
Wed, 06/18/2014 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Multiple petitioners filed a restoration petition against the respondent, granted with a condition to pay costs to the respondent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition was allowed on the condition of paying costs to the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Allowed with cost payment
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed on the condition of paying costs to the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.5,000/- on or before 18-6-2014 to respondent vide order in separate sheet.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chembeettil Gangadharan
Relation
P1
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vazhakkattil Sunil
Relation
P2
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thazhathepurakkal Devayani
Relation
P3
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Anoop
Relation
P4
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abhi
Relation
P5
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mymoona
Relation
P6
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kappattakath Valiyil Abduraheem
Plaintiffs Documents
None mentioned
Defendants Documents
None mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.R. Vijayan
Appearance Type
Appearing Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Restoration Petition
Outcome: Allowed with cost payment
Description:
Restoration petition allowed with a condition to pay costs to respondent.
Evidence:
Petition allowed on condition to pay cost of Rs.5,000/- on or before 18-6-2014 to respondent vide order in separate sheet.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 01/18/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/18/2014 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2014 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vazhamthodi Saidalavi vs Thekkethil Marakkar and Keyamthodi Kunhipathu regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dakshayani vs Moolethodi Ramachandran Nair regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kolangara Kumaran et al vs Haridasan et al regarding restoration petition
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Restoration petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Muhamemd Ajmal Hidayathulla vs Beerankoya et al regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between N.K.Sanni vs Solaman Thomas regarding restoration petition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won