Case Summary
Petitioner Muhamemd Ajmal Hidayathulla filed a restoration petition which was allowed by the court, restoring the suit as per order in IA 1077/15.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of Suit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition filed by the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition is allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 1077/15.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhamemd Ajmal Hidayathulla
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beerankoya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suhara
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vettom Panchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.R. Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Suresh A Alingal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of suit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the suit as per order in IA 1077/15.
Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition is allowed. Suit is restored as per order in IA 1077/15.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2015