Case Summary
Petitioners sought restoration with a condition to deposit cost of Rs. 4000.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petitioner is allowed on the condition to deposit the cost of Rs. 4000.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Unknown
Judgment Evidence:
Petitioner is allowed on condition to deposit cost of Rs.4000/- on or before 3-2-14 vide order in separate sheet.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Mammad
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Alikkoya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathimma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aneef Khan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Basheer
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shamsudheen
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mariyambeevi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Fathimma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ayisha Beevi
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thannikkat Abdullakutty-died
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aboobacker
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jameela
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Nazeema
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Nizar
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- C.Nandakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- P.Ajayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2013