Case Summary
Petitioner Shanavas filed a restoration application which was granted by the court upon payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of Application
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Application
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration application on payment of costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The restoration application dismissed as non payment of batta. Hence the IA stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2500/- and for payment. Cost paid. Hence IA closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shanavas
- Relation
- Represented by POA
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- General Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of Application
Evidence:
The restoration application dismissed as non payment of batta. Hence the IA stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs.2500/- and for payment. Cost paid. Hence IA closed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration Application
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PT
Case Code Year
2015