Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89 OF 2016

Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Indus Towers ltd. filed a suit against Muhammed Abdul Khadar for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant obstructed their access to their mobile telephone infrastructure on the defendant's property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was abated due to the death of the defendant and the plaintiffs' failure to implead the legal heirs. No steps were taken by the plaintiff even after the defendant's counsel informed the court about the defendant's demise.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was abated due to the death of the defendant and the plaintiffs' failure to implead the legal heirs. No steps were taken by the plaintiff even after the defendant's counsel informed the court about the defendant's demise.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was abated as no legal heirs were impleaded within the required time after the defendant's death.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Here 220 days have been passed after the death of the defendant and no steps were taken by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit stands abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Indus Towers ltd.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Abdul Khadar
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Prakash ramanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Midhun Raj E.M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Riyas V.T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's activities.
Evidence:
The suit is one for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant, his family men, employees or associates from any manner interfering with or obstructing the plaintiffs activities on the plaint schedule property or denying free access to company staffs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 03/17/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Company

Similar Cases

Case between Koonathil Pathummu Umma et al vs Thanikkatt Muhammed et al regarding injunction and compensation
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sunil vs Abdul Azees regarding eviction and compensation
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Jemsheena vs Raheem et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Krishana. M. Jayesh vs Kerala state et al regarding Suit for injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Palakka Valappil Pelayam parambil Hamza @ Bava vs Kalleri Mohandas regarding recovery of possession
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit Defendant Won