Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89 OF 2016

Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-22
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Indus Towers ltd. filed a suit against Muhammed Abdul Khadar for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant obstructed their access to their mobile telephone infrastructure on the defendant's property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was abated due to the death of the defendant and the plaintiffs' failure to implead the legal heirs. No steps were taken by the plaintiff even after the defendant's counsel informed the court about the defendant's demise.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was abated as no legal heirs were impleaded within the required time after the defendant's death.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit stands abated.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Indus Towers ltd. (Age not specified years) 8th Floor Vankarath Towers, NH 47, Palarivattom, Kochi-682 024

Defendants

Muhammed Abdul Khadar (63 years years) Pathantepurakkal House, Paravanna Post, Vettom Village, Paravanna desom, Tirur Taluk Pin: 676 502.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's activities.
Evidence:
The suit is one for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendant, his family men, employees or associates from any manner interfering with or obstructing the plaintiffs activities on the plaint schedule property or denying free access to company staffs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Thu, 03/17/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Company

Similar Cases