Company

Haridas M, the plaintiff, was reported to be deceased prior to the court appearance. The defendants were present, but the plaintiff's counsel indicated no legal heirs had been impleaded.

The plaintiffs, Muhammed Nazir and Rukiya Nazir, filed a suit against the defendants, M/s GTL Infrastructure Ltd and others, under the Code of Civil Procedure. The case involved a judgment where the plaint was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted.

The petitioner Jameela Bhasi filed an execution petition against Business Benefit Co.Ltd and its directors. The court heard the petition and ruled on its maintainability.

Omana Amma filed a petition against Business Benefit Company Ltd and others regarding a decree execution. The court dismissed the petition as both sides were absent.

Suresh.C. is the decree holder seeking execution against Business Benefit Company Ltd and others. The petition concerns execution of a decree under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Suresh.G. is the decree holder in this matter, seeking enforcement of a decree. The judgment debtors include Business Benefit Company Ltd and others.

Omana Amma is the decree holder, while Business Benefit Company Ltd and others are the judgment debtors. The case involves a petition for execution of a decree.

The case involves Suresh.C. as the decree holder and Business Benefit Company Ltd along with its directors as judgment debtors. The execution petition was filed for enforcement but was dismissed.

M/s. Muthoot Microfin Ltd. filed a petition against Pushpamma under the Code of Civil Procedure. The court dismissed the petition due to the decree holder's absence and non-compliance with the order.

The case involves plaintiffs Saji Kumamr. G and others filing for an injunction against defendants Asianet Satellite Communications Ltd. and Asianet Digital Network Pvt. Ltd. The plaintiffs sought relief under the Code of Civil Procedure.