Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 644/2025

Case between Haridas M vs M/s Auto grade Industries Private limited et al regarding abatement of suit due to plaintiff's death.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2026-01-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Haridas M, the plaintiff, was reported to be deceased prior to the court appearance. The defendants were present, but the plaintiff's counsel indicated no legal heirs had been impleaded.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to the plaintiff's death and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as abated due to the plaintiff's death and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and not represented, and no legal heirs were impleaded.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and not represented, and no legal heirs were impleaded.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is reported to be no more by the counsel for the plaintiff as early as on 29/09/2025.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed as abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Haridas M
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Auto grade Industries Private limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.Mohammed Asharaf
Party Age
65
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arifa
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.R.Jayaprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashok K.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Devika J.M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Geevan T Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Antony Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as abated due to the plaintiff being reported deceased.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is reported to be no more by the counsel for the plaintiff as early as on 29/09/2025.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Haridas M vs M/s Auto grade Industries Private limited et al regarding abatement of suit due to plaintiff's death.
Case Code Year
Case between Haridas M vs M/s Auto grade Industries Private limited et al regarding abatement of suit due to plaintiff's death.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won