Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89 OF 2016 — Case between Indus Towers ltd. vs Muhammed Abdul Khadar regarding injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Original Suit No. 35 of 2017
Case between Krishana. M. Jayesh vs Kerala state et al regarding Suit for injunction
The case involves Krishana. M. Jayesh, a minor represented by her mother, who filed a suit against the Kerala state and others for injunction. The plaintiff did not press the suit, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 94 OF 2016
Case between Palakka Valappil Pelayam parambil Hamza @ Bava vs Kalleri Mohandas regarding recovery of possession
Palakka Valappil Pelayam parambil Hamza @ Bava, aged 85, filed a suit against Kalleri Mohandas, aged 50, for recovery of possession with arrears of rent.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 13 OF 2016
Case between Koonathil Pathummu Umma et al vs Thanikkatt Muhammed et al regarding injunction and compensation
Koonathil Pathummu Umma and Thanikkatt Muhammedali are plaintiffs claiming that their basement was unlawfully demolished by the defendants including the Triprangode Grama Panchayat and its Secretary. The defendants argue that the plaintiffs encroached onto public property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 274 OF 2017
Case between Sunil vs Abdul Azees regarding eviction and compensation
Sunil filed a suit against Abdul Azees for eviction and compensation for wrongful use of a shop room. The court found in favor of Sunil as the defendant failed to vacate the premises despite multiple notices.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 193 OF 2015
Case between Jemsheena vs Raheem et al regarding injunction
Jemsheena filed a suit seeking an injunction against Raheem and others who allegedly obstructed her access to a way leading to her property. The defendants contended that no such way existed and sought to dismiss the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 298 OF 2015
Case between Pulikkalakath Aboobacker's children vs Naduparambil Muhammed Ali regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, children of Pulikkalakath Aboobacker, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Naduparambil Muhammed Ali, regarding a shop room they claim possession of. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant incorrectly asserts a right to occupy the shop room, which they have renovated for a new business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 486/2012
Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Noushad et al regarding financial settlement
The case involved a financial settlement dispute where the respondent, Noushad-R1 and Abdu-R2, paid the full amount resulting in the recording of full satisfaction and closure of the Execution Petition.
Execution Proceeding
Plaintiff Won
Restor.Pt 3523/2015
Case between Shanavas vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd. et al regarding restoration application
Petitioner Shanavas filed a restoration application which was granted by the court upon payment of costs.
Civil Suit - Restoration Application
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 252 OF 2016
Case between Subhash et al vs Accomplish Marketing Company et al regarding money realisation
Plaintiff handed over Rs.9,00,000 to defendants for jewellery business profits but was not paid. Court decreed defendants to pay Rs.9,96,378 with interest.
Civil Suit - Money Realisation
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 97 OF 2017
Case between Shaji vs Thunchath Jewellers et al regarding money realization
Plaintiff Shaji filed a suit against Thunchath Jewellers and others seeking realization of money borrowed with gold security and alleging breach of agreement terms by the defendants.
Civil Suit - Money Realization
Plaintiff Won
S.T.No:12/2018
Case between Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd vs Dr. Senthilkumar regarding Offence under N.I. Act.
Sree Gokulam Chit & Finance Co-Pvt. Ltd filed a complaint against Dr. Senthilkumar for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act. The complainant later sought permission to withdraw the complaint, which was granted by the court.
Criminal Case
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 450/2019
Case between Gilroy Mendez vs M/s Bhagyodayam Company Ltd. regarding modification of injunction order
The plaintiff, Gilroy Mendez, filed a suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against M/s Bhagyodayam Company Ltd. for interference with his possession of the property. The plaintiff's request to modify a previous injunction order to impose conditions for paying arrears was dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 365/2020
Case between KPB Nidhi Limited vs Ms. Geethalakshmi et al regarding mediation settlement
KPB Nidhi Limited filed a suit against Ms. Geethalakshmi and others. The matter was settled in mediation, leading to the acceptance of the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1227/2022
Case between Careon Healthcare Solutions (p) ltd vs Keerthy regarding recovery of money
Careon Healthcare Solutions (p) ltd is seeking recovery of a debt from Keerthy, a dealer who failed to pay for products supplied on credit. The court proceedings were ex parte due to the defendant's non-appearance.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.743/2020
Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Ashok Kumar, K.R.Sarojini, K.P. Jayaprakash regarding recovery of money.
The plaintiff, M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd., is seeking recovery of Rs.1,18,851/- from the defendants for a loan sanctioned as part of a hire purchase agreement. The defendants did not respond or appear in court, leading to a default judgment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.766/2020
Case between M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. vs Dinesh Kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default
M/s Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd. filed a suit against Dinesh Kumar and others. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present to adduce evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 4/2013
Case between Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. vs Musthafa regarding Decree
Subitha Leasing Company Ltd. filed a case against Musthafa resulting in a judgment on the decree.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 473/2012
Case between Thennala Service Co-op.Bank vs Mohan et al regarding loan closure
Thennala Service Co-op.Bank filed a case against Mohan, Pratheesh, and Ranjith seeking loan closure, which was closed by endorsement on the notice.
Civil Suit
EP 206/2012
Case between C.S.Nanu et al vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Decree
Four decree holders sued Muhammed Abdul Noor and obtained a judgment in their favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 14/2013
Case between South Malabar Gramin Bank vs K.Balakrishnan regarding decree transmission
South Malabar Gramin Bank filed a case against K.Balakrishnan for decree transmission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2634/2012
Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Petitioner Hamza filed a petition seeking a favorable decision, which was allowed on the condition of paying a cost of RS.1000, later paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2477/2012
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Petitioner Mullanmadakkal Mammi filed a petition on medical grounds, which was allowed with the condition of paying costs of Rs. 1000.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 124/2012
Case between Secretary, Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Mullakkoyamakkanakath Najmudheen et al regarding debt recovery
The Secretary of Niramaruthur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. filed a case against multiple judgment debtors for debt recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 132/2012
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Hamza Haji as the decree holder claimed property delivery against Chakkalakkal Harif and Illikkal Khadeeja, resulting in property delivered and EP closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2389/2012
Case between Thami et al vs Suresh Babu regarding an order to pay costs
Petition allowed on condition of paying cost of Rs.3000 by petitioner to respondent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RP 2703/2012
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
A petition was allowed on the condition that the petitioner pays costs to the respondent by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 393/2012
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Unniveettil Vinesh filed a case against Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan for property delivery, and the court ordered the property to be delivered.
Civil Suit
EP 348/2011
Case between Kunnathodi Sarada et al vs Puliyakkathodi Kolavan et al regarding delivery of property
Decree holder Kunnathodi Sarada filed a case against several defendants for the delivery of property, which was ultimately granted by the court on 30-07-2013.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 38/2013
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Petition filed by P.Damkumar against multiple judgment debtors was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 298/2011
Case between Secretary,Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Vinod et al regarding default of payment
Secretary of Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. filed a case against Vinod, Subrahmanian, and Abdul Niyad seeking a decree for default of payment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 273/2011
Case between Malappuram Dist.Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs K.Hussain et al regarding debt repayment
Dispute between Malappuram Dist.Co-op.Bank seeking repayment of debt from K.Hussain and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 60/2013
Case between Secretary vs Hamza Poozhithara et al regarding default judgment
The Secretary of Perumanna Klari Service Co-op.Bank filed a petition against Hamza Poozhithara and Muideenkutty Pappal seeking a decree. The petition was dismissed for default due to non-payment of batta and no steps taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 313/2012
Case between The Secretary vs Mohammed Kaliyattu Parambil regarding unknown
The Secretary from Valavannur Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. filed a petition against Mohammed Kaliyattu Parambil with no evidence provided leading to dismissal of the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 253/2012
Case between Kunnamkulam Financing Co.Ltd. vs Muhammed Ismail regarding default
Kunnamkulam Financing Co.Ltd. filed a case against Muhammed Ismail, where the petition was dismissed for default as no steps were taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 110/2013
Case between Secretary vs Ramadas Unnikkandamveettil et al regarding debt settlement
The Secretary filed a case against Ramadas Unnikkandamveettil and Sudheesh Unnikkandamveettil for debt settlement. The judgment debtor paid the full amount, and the case was closed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 141/2013
Case between Secretary vs Raveendran et al regarding payment dispute
The Secretary of Mangalam Service Co-op.Bank filed a case against Raveendran and Velayudhan regarding a payment dispute.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 214/2013
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Jabir.P.K. regarding maintainability
Kerala Gramin Bank filed a case against Jabir.P.K. seeking a decree, but the case was dismissed as not maintainable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 484/2012
Case between The Secretary vs Madathil Mohamed et al regarding petition dismissal
The Secretary filed a petition against Madathil Mohamed and Kizhakkethodi Faizel seeking certain decree. However, the case was dismissed due to lack of evidence regarding respondent's means.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 180/2013
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Muhammed Thameem as the Decree Holder filed a case against Muhammed Abdul Noor. The petition was dismissed for default due to non-production of necessary documents.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP 2684/2012
Case between Cheriya Kallyapurath Muhammed Hashim vs Naduvilaparambil Ali Haji regarding unknown
Petitioner Cheriya Kallyapurath Muhammed Hashim filed a petition against respondent Naduvilaparambil Ali Haji, which was allowed conditionally upon depositing a cost of Rs.10,000 by a specified date.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 222/2013
Case between Secretary vs Thekkan Damodaran et al regarding debt payment
A case filed by the Secretary of Purathur Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. against Thekkan Damodaran and Thekkan Prasad for debt payment.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP42/2013
Case between Vineeshkumar et al vs Kumaran regarding compliance with High Court directions
The case involves Vineeshkumar et al seeking compliance with High Court directions from Kumaran, which was closed due to failure to submit affidavit and documents as directed by the High Court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 81/2013
Case between P.Damkumar vs Moideen Koyathinte Purakkal et al regarding petition dismissal
Petition filed by P.Damkumar against multiple judgment debtors was dismissed without any cost as it was not pressed.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
FDA 1282/2011
Case between Koulath et al vs Akbar Ali et al regarding Absence of Instruction
The petition was filed by minors represented by their mother against the respondents. The counsel for the petitioner reported not having instructions from clients, resulting in dismissal of the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 55/2011
Case between Janaki vs Unnikirishnan regarding pending second appeal
Janaki as the decree holder filed a case against Unnikirishnan as the judgment debtor. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed since a second appeal is pending before the Honorable High Court.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
EP 112/2013
Case between Secretary vs Moidu Cheruparambil et al regarding petition for decree debt payment
The Secretary of Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. filed a petition against multiple judgment debtors for decree debt payment. The petition was dismissed due to lack of evidence of means to pay by the first respondent.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 127/2013
Case between The Secretary vs Ahammed.K et al regarding financial dispute
The case involved a dispute between The Secretary of Thennala Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Ahammed.K et al over a financial matter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 46/2012
Case between Managing Partner, Sooraj Bankers vs Faizal regarding Decree
The Managing Partner of Sooraj Bankers filed a petition against Faizal, seeking a decree, which was later dismissed due to petitioner's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won