Case Summary
The Managing Partner of Sooraj Bankers filed a petition against Faizal, seeking a decree, which was later dismissed due to petitioner's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition seeking a decree was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Managing Partner, Sooraj Bankers
- Relation
- Managing Partner
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faizal
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate not entered
- Appearance Type
- Not applicable
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Not Decided
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking a decree
Evidence:
The petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2012