Case Summary
The petition was filed by minors represented by their mother against the respondents. The counsel for the petitioner reported not having instructions from clients, resulting in dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissed
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioners in court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Name of petitioners called. They are absent. Hence the petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Koulath-P1
- Relation
- Mother of Sahad Afreedi, Ayisha Hanona, Fathima Visna
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sahad Afreedi-minor-P2
- Relation
- Minor rep. by next friend guardian mother Koulath P1
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ayisha Hanona-minor
- Relation
- Minor rep. by next friend guardian mother Koulath P1
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima Visna-minor-P4
- Relation
- Minor rep. by next friend guardian mother Koulath P1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akbar Ali-R1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faseela-R2
- Party Age
- 20
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Riyaz Muhammed-R3
- Party Age
- 24
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Unknown
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Unknown
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
FDA
Case Code Year
2011