Case Summary
Petitioners filed a case against respondents for representation negligence by their absence in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Interlocutory Application (IA) dismissed with costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the Interlocutory Application (IA) due to the absence of petitioners with imposed costs.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
It is submitted by the petitioner that the petitioners not turn up. The name of petitioner called absent. No representation. Hence IA dismissed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Karappan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Velayudhan
- Party Age
- 38
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopaolan
- Party Age
- 34
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.P.Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Interlocutory Application (IA)
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Petitioners not turning up resulting in dismissal of IA with costs
Evidence:
It is submitted by the petitioner that the petitioners not turn up. The name of petitioner called absent. No representation. Hence IA dismissed with costs.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
FDA
Case Code Year
2008