Case Summary
A case involving a restoration petition filed by Hamza against Rukhiya where the petitioner was allowed to proceed after paying a cost to the respondent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition stands allowed after the petitioner paid the cost to the respondent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Not clearly mentioned
Not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Petition stands allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Hamza
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rukhiya
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mehroof Shihab
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Rukhiya
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition allowed after payment of cost to respondent
Evidence:
Petition stands allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2014