Case Summary
Edathadathil Sainaba filed a case against Muhammed Abdul Noor, seeking a judgment in their favor. The case was dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to produce necessary documents.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of the petition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed for default judgment due to the petitioner's failure to produce necessary documents.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Since the petitioner failed to produce DSP and EC. In spite of availing chances, the petition is dismissed for default
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Edathadathil Sainaba
- Party Age
- 44
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Abdul Noor
- Party Age
- 36
Plaintiffs Documents
Dismissed for default as DSP and EC were not produced.
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.C.Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Yoonus Ali Chatheri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Muhammed Abdul Noor
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Dismissal of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Dismissed for default judgment
Evidence:
Since the petitioner failed to produce DSP and EC. In spite of availing chances, the petition is dismissed for default
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Default Judgment
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2013