Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 162 /2023 — Case between KADUKKANKANDIYIL KUNHIKANNAN vs KADUKKANKANDIYIL KUNHIKANARAN regarding partition of property
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT 125/2021
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Alikkutty. T. P and Asya, while the defendant is Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji. The case involves a suit filed under the Civil Procedure Code, but the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 47/2024
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji, allege that the defendants trespassed on their property and caused damage. The case seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants to prevent further interference with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS/1136/1953
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
This case involves the petitioners Thondarkulangara Korumbathi and others against the respondents Thondarkulangara Chekkon and others regarding a preliminary decree. The court issued its order on the date specified.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 72/2025
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves SYNDICATE BANK as the plaintiff against ADARSH. A. C and others as defendants concerning a civil suit. The matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 148/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the Decree Holder/Plaintiff seeking execution of a petition against MUTHURAJ, who is reported to be abroad. The petition was not executed as the Judgment Debtor was unavailable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 5/2024
Case between Gangadharan vs Ahammad et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff Gangadharan is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and constructing a mobile tower in proximity to his property. The defendants include Ahammad and Summit Digital Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., who are accused of disturbing the plaintiff's property boundaries.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 16/2023
Case between Asya vs C. K. Sahad regarding fixation of boundary and recovery of possession
Asya and C. K. Sahad, siblings, are involved in a dispute regarding the encroachment of property. The plaintiff, Asya, claims that the defendant has unlawfully constructed on her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 17/2025
Case between FEDERAL BANK vs RADHA. N. P et al regarding settlement of suit.
The case involves FEDERAL BANK as the plaintiff and RADHA. N. P, NANU. N. P, RASEETHA. P. B as defendants. The matter has been settled.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 26/2013
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Kuttiyil Pocker et al regarding dismissal of suit due to abatement.
The plaintiff, Meenakshi Amma, filed a suit against defendants including Kuttiyil Pocker and others. The court found that the plaintiff had expired and no steps were taken to implead legal heirs, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 11/2016
Case between Kurunnan Veetil Usman et al vs Kurunnan Veetil Moideen et al regarding fixation and mandatory injunction.
The petitioners, Kurunnan Veetil Usman and Kurunnan Veetil Safiya, have filed a petition to implead Jameela K.V. as a supplemental defendant in a suit regarding a property dispute. The respondents oppose the petition stating it is belated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RPIA. No. 21/2024 in OS. No. 50/2022
Case between THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI vs KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER regarding restoration of dismissed suit
The petitioner, THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI, seeks to restore a suit that was dismissed for default. The respondent, KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER, opposes the petition claiming lack of bonafides and absence of medical evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 133/2024
Case between VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU vs V. V. MUHAMMADALI et al regarding Suit dismissal
VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU is the plaintiff, and V. V. MUHAMMADALI along with several others are the defendants. The case was about a suit that was not pressed and subsequently dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 91/2024
Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
The case involves RAMLA as the plaintiff and SUBAIR as the defendant. It is a petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to assist in measuring property boundaries and to provide injunctions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 100/2024
Case between SAMEERA et al vs JAMEELA et al regarding settlement of a civil dispute.
This case involves a civil dispute between the plaintiffs, led by SAMEERA, and the defendants, led by JAMEELA. The matter was settled amicably between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 23/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JAMES. K. P regarding recovery of loan amount.
This case involves KERALA GRAMIN BANK seeking to recover an agricultural loan amount from JAMES. K. P. The defendant failed to repay the loan, leading to the plaintiff bank filing the suit for recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 80/2023
Case between Vattakandiyil Kamala vs Binu et al regarding mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Vattakandiyil Kamala and Vattakandiyil Babu @ Suresh Babu, are seeking mandatory and prohibitory injunctions against the defendants for alleged encroachment and illegal construction on their property. The defendants, including Binu, claim adherence to building rules and deny any encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 41 /2018
Case between MEETHALE PALOLLATHIL KANNAN et al vs KUNIYIL KANNAN et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition application filed by the plaintiffs regarding certain properties as per a preliminary decree. The petitioners seek a final decree based on the preliminary judgment, where shares in the properties are divided among the plaintiffs and defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 40/2025
Case between P. Sunil vs Hameed et al regarding injunction
P. Sunil, the petitioner, filed an application for an ad-interim injunction against the respondents Hameed and Manesh. The court granted the injunction as there was no rent in arrears from the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 39/2025
Case between Chandrasekharan vs Savitha et al regarding injunction
Chandrasekharan is the petitioner who filed for an ad-interim injunction against Savitha and others. The court found that a prima facie case had been established for granting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 72/2021
Case between KANIYOTH SEENATH vs KANIYOTH ABDUL RAZAQ regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
The plaintiff, KANIYOTH SEENATH, filed a suit against the defendant, KANIYOTH ABDUL RAZAQ, for fixing the boundary and seeking injunction against trespassing. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has encroached upon her property as per the title deed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 146/2022
Case between Girija vs Peedikayulla Parambath Indira et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Girija, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Peedikayulla Parambath Indira and others to prevent them from trespassing into her property. The dispute concerns the identification and ownership of specific land boundaries that the plaintiff claims as part of her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 99/2023
Case between Baburaj vs Karimbil Abdulkader Haji et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
This case involves Baburaj as the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Karimbil Abdulkader Haji and Rabiya, the defendants. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants are blocking his access to his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP No. 36/2022
Case between REEMA vs JAYASREE regarding Execution Petition
Reema filed an execution petition against Jayasree. The court ordered the closure of the execution petition after the full amount was received by the decree holder.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 10/2025
Case between Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji vs Shyni et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji is the plaintiff, who claims ownership of a property and seeks protection against trespass by the defendants, Shyni, Akshaya, and Arjun. The defendants did not appear in court, resulting in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 81/2024
Case between CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI, BALAKRISHNAN vs VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
The plaintiffs, CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI and BALAKRISHNAN, filed a suit against VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH and the Secretary of the Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 113/2024
Case between Saleena vs Ajeendran Alakandi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Saleena is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Ajeendran Alakandi and others. The case involves allegations of trespassing and attempts to alter the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 15/2024
Case between N. K. Chandran vs Secretary, Nadapuram Gramapanchayath et al regarding IA No. 12/2025
N. K. Chandran, the plaintiff, sought relief through a petition in the Court of the Munsiff at Nadapuram. The respondents, including various government officials and contractors, were involved in the case regarding a belated petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 15/2024
Case between N. K. Chandran vs SECRETARY, NADAPURAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff, N. K. Chandran, filed a suit against multiple defendants including the Secretary of Nadapuram Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP-230/2023
Case between null vs null regarding null
The matter was settled between the parties involved. Full satisfaction was recorded and the EP was closed.
Civil Suit
OS. No. 22 /2022
Case between RAHILA vs FATHIMA et al regarding settlement
The case involves a petition filed by RAHILA against FATHIMA and others concerning a settlement. The court has accepted the settlement terms.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 79/2024
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs SIJU THOMAS regarding settlement of suit
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the plaintiff and SIJU THOMAS is the defendant in this suit. The matter was settled through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 125/2024
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ASHRAF. M regarding suit not pressed.
KERALA GRAMIN BANK, represented by Soorya Prakash, filed a suit against ASHRAF. M. The matter was settled and the suit was not pressed by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Dismissed
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 89/2019
Case between Naseema vs Karappayil Paravantekandi Usman et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
Naseema is the plaintiff, and she brought the case against Karappayil Paravantekandi Usman and others. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 99/2021
Case between ABOOBAKER et al vs POMKUNNUMMAL ASHRAF regarding Suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs ABOOBAKER, ABDURAHIMAN VANNATHANTAVIDA, and ABDUL HAMEED filed a suit against the defendant POMKUNNUMMAL ASHRAF. The case was dismissed for default after the plaintiff reported no instructions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 112/2023
Case between Parambatha Manhambravan Kunhabdulla Haji vs Parambath Ayissa et al regarding specific performance of a contract.
The plaintiff, Parambatha Manhambravan Kunhabdulla Haji, is seeking specific performance in relation to a property agreement with the defendants, who include Parambath Ayissa and others. The dispute arose after the defendants allegedly delayed executing a surrender deed for certain properties as per their agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 132/2022
Case between Nanu Arettummal vs Narayani Nellikunnummal et al regarding partition and separate possession
Nanu Arettummal, the plaintiff, is seeking partition of the jointly owned property after the death of his father. The defendants are opposing this claim, stating the property is not identifiable and they're not in joint ownership with the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
FDIA. No. 20/2024 in OS. No. 135 /2023
Case between Asya. N. P vs Kadeesa Kammulathiyil regarding settlement of a petition
Asya. N. P and her children are the petitioners against Kadeesa Kammulathiyil and others. The case involved a settlement agreement accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 10/2024
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs VASANTHA et al regarding suit dismissal.
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the plaintiff represented by Rincy A. P. The case involves a civil suit that was dismissed based on a settlement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 98/2023
Case between Kanavath Kunhikrishnan Nambiar vs Kanavath Meethal Moidu et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction and damages
Kanavath Kunhikrishnan Nambiar filed a suit against Kanavath Meethal Moidu and others for dumping waste materials on his property. The plaintiff sought an injunction to stop the dumping and claimed damages.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 136/2023
Case between Athul. M. G vs Bhasheer et al regarding realization of money
The plaintiff, Athul. M. G, is a businessman who invested Rs. 5,00,000 in a fruit business promoted by the defendants, Bhasheer, Ashraf, and Shinto. After the defendants failed to induct him as a partner and return the invested amount, the plaintiff filed a suit for recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 96/2024
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ARJUN MOHAN et al regarding realization of money.
The Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit for the recovery of ₹9,66,137/- from the defendants who had defaulted on an educational loan. The first defendant, who had left India, had the suit against him dismissed while the other defendants admitted the claim and the court decreed the suit for recovery with costs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 26/2024
Case between Balan vs Vinil Babu regarding specific performance of a promise
The plaintiffs, Balan and Sarojini, are seeking a decree for specific performance against their son, Vinil Babu, regarding a property gifted to him for securing a loan. The defendant has breached the agreement to reconvey the property upon settling the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 53/2024
Case between Sulochana vs Balakrishna Kurup et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
Sulochana is the plaintiff in this suit against Balakrishna Kurup and others. The case has been dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of proof affidavit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 136/2024
Case between SASIDHARA VARMA. E. K vs THE MANAGING COMMITTEE– KADATHANAD RAJAS HIGH SECONDARY SCHOOL regarding the dismissal of suit.
Sasidharan Varma E. K is the plaintiff against the Managing Committee of Kadathanad Rajas High Secondary School and its president. The suit has been dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
FDIA. No. 9/2024 in OS. No. 40/2021
Case between Nalini et al vs Vasu @ Vasudevan regarding settlement
Nalini and others filed a petition against Vasu regarding a settlement issue. The matter was settled with a joint statement and final decree passed as per the terms of settlement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 151/2023
Case between ASHOKAN vs THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE et al regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff ASHOKAN filed a suit against THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE and its members. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won