Case Summary
The petitioners, Kurunnan Veetil Usman and Kurunnan Veetil Safiya, have filed a petition to implead Jameela K.V. as a supplemental defendant in a suit regarding a property dispute. The respondents oppose the petition stating it is belated.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Jameela K.V. is to be impleaded as additional defendant No. 7.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitions to implead Jameela K.V. as a supplemental defendant because she is a necessary and proper party to the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that Jameela was in exclusive possession of the property per the partition karar.
The court found that Jameela was in exclusive possession of the property per the partition karar.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that Jameela was in exclusive possession of the property per the partition karar.
The court found that Jameela was in exclusive possession of the property per the partition karar.
Supporting Evidence
It is found that as per the partition karar Sri. Jameela was in exclusive possession of the B schedule property and she has assigned the property to the 1st plaintiff as per the said karar.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA 11/2025 and IA 12/2025 is allowed and office is directed to implead Smt. Jameela as the additional defendant No.7.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kurunnan Veetil Usman
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kurunnan Veetil Safiya
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kurunnan Veetil Moideen
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kurunnan Veetil Kunhipathu
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kurunnan Veetil Basheer
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kurunnan Veetil Hajira
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. K. Anil Raj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Fareed Kalleri
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N. M. Rajagopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petitioners are directed to take steps to issue summons to the proposed defendant.
Evidence:
Hence, the petition is allowed and petitioners are directed to take steps to issue summons to the proposed defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kurunnan Veetil Usman et al vs Kurunnan Veetil Moideen et al regarding fixation and mandatory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Kurunnan Veetil Usman et al vs Kurunnan Veetil Moideen et al regarding fixation and mandatory injunction.