Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 91/2024

Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.

Court
The Court of the Munsiff, Nadapuram
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-03-26
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves RAMLA as the plaintiff and SUBAIR as the defendant. It is a petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to assist in measuring property boundaries and to provide injunctions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition for appointing an Advocate Commissioner and a Taluk Surveyor to measure the property and fix the boundary based on the title deed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Appointment of Advocate V. Lathesh as Advocate Commissioner and a Taluk Surveyor.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for appointing an Advocate Commissioner and a Taluk Surveyor to measure the property and fix the boundary based on the title deed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court considered the interests of justice and the principles regarding property measurement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court considered the interests of justice and the principles regarding property measurement.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for respondent objected the same stating that property cannot be measured in the measurements are not mentioned in the partition deed. However, respondent submits that the property can be measured by the Advocate Commissioner based on possession.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, in the interest of justice the petition is allowed and Advocate V. Lathesh is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
RAMLA
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SUBAIR
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagoplan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Siju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Ranjith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Appointment of Advocate Commissioner to measure the property and fix the boundary.
Evidence:
Hence, in the interest of justice the petition is allowed and Advocate V. Lathesh is appointed as the Advocate Commissioner.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the petition to appoint an Advocate Commissioner for measuring the property and fixing the boundary.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode district, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won