Original Suit No. 26/2013

Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Kuttiyil Pocker et al regarding dismissal of suit due to abatement.

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM

Judge

Sri. Yadukrishnan. B

Order Date

2025-03-29

Duration

Case Closed

Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Meenakshi Amma, filed a suit against defendants including Kuttiyil Pocker and others. The court found that the plaintiff had expired and no steps were taken to implead legal heirs, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as abated due to the plaintiff's death and the failure to implead legal heirs.

Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the abatement caused by the plaintiff's death.

Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the abatement caused by the plaintiff's death.

Supporting Evidence

As per the report of Process Server plaintiff expired 3 years before. No steps to implead legal heirs taken.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed as abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Meenakshi Amma
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kuttiyil Pocker
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Noushad
Party Age: 35
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Asya
Party Age: 60
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Nabeen
Party Age: 38
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sameera
Party Age: 35
Relation: D/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. N. M. Rajagopal
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

The suit is dismissed as abated due to the plaintiff's death.

Evidence: