Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 22 /2022

Case between RAHILA vs FATHIMA et al regarding settlement

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM.
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition filed by RAHILA against FATHIMA and others concerning a settlement. The court has accepted the settlement terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has accepted the settlement between the parties and passed a final decree based on the terms agreed upon.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has accepted the settlement between the parties and passed a final decree based on the terms agreed upon.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled amicably between the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled amicably between the parties.
Supporting Evidence
The court passed the following:- O R D E R Petitioner represented. Razi petition filed. Razi accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Matter settled. Terms of razi forms the part of final decree proceedings.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
RAHILA
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
FATHIMA
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
RAHINA
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
RAHIMA
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. P. Pradeepan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. A. K. Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Shabana. M. K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Matter settled. Terms of razi forms the part of final decree proceedings.
Evidence:
Final decree is passed on the basis of terms arrived at.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between RAHILA vs FATHIMA et al regarding settlement
Case Code Year
Case between RAHILA vs FATHIMA et al regarding settlement

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won