Case Summary
Naseema is the plaintiff, and she brought the case against Karappayil Paravantekandi Usman and others. The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit because the plaintiff was absent and did not have representation. The defendants were present.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Naseema
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Karappayil Paravantekandi Usman
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Koppanamkandi Thahira
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Othayoth Najla
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. O. T. Jabish
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Adeeb Salah
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not ready for evidence. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Naseema vs Karappayil Paravantekandi Usman et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Naseema vs Karappayil Paravantekandi Usman et al regarding suit dismissed for default.