OS. No. 39/2025

Case between Chandrasekharan vs Savitha et al regarding injunction

Court

THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM

Judge

Sri. Yadukrishnan.B

Order Date

2025-03-19

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chandrasekharan is the petitioner who filed for an ad-interim injunction against Savitha and others. The court found that a prima facie case had been established for granting the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Ad-interim injunction until the disposal of the suit

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court granted the ad-interim injunction as requested by the petitioner until the disposal of the suit.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case for the injunction.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established a prima facie case for the injunction.

Supporting Evidence

Satisfied that petitioner has made out a prima facie case, issuance of notice before granting injunction would defeat the purpose by delay.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted as prayed for until the disposal of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: CHANDRASEKHARAN
Party Age: 68
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: SAVITHA
Party Age: 45
Relation: W/o (Late)

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: VAISHNA
Party Age: 20
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: SAJEESH
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: SANTHOSH
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: RAMESAN
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. M. Siju
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Smt. Divya. K. K
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

an ad-interim injunction is granted as prayed for until the disposal of the suit

Evidence: