Case Summary
The case involves a partition application filed by the plaintiffs regarding certain properties as per a preliminary decree. The petitioners seek a final decree based on the preliminary judgment, where shares in the properties are divided among the plaintiffs and defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition and separate possession of the allocated shares.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a final decree for the partition of the properties involved according to the preliminary decree. Shares were allocated among the plaintiffs and defendants as articulated in the judgment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their entitlement to shares as per the preliminary decree.
The plaintiffs proved their entitlement to shares as per the preliminary decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their entitlement to shares as per the preliminary decree.
The plaintiffs proved their entitlement to shares as per the preliminary decree.
Supporting Evidence
The parties are entitled to get their respective share over the plaint schedule property based on the preliminary decree and judgment.
Judgment Evidence:
1) Plot D in Ext.C1 to C9 plan and plot B in Ext.C8 plan is allotted to the share of 1st petitioner and is entitled to get partition and separate possession over the same. 2) Plot D in Ext.C1 and C7 plan, is allotted to the share of the 2nd petitioner and is entitled to get partition and separate possession of the same.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- MEETHALE PALOLLATHIL KANNAN
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- MEETHALE PALOLLATHIL KUMARAN
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- MEETHALEPALOLLATHIL LEELA @ MATHU
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- PUTHIYEDUTHU KUNNUMMAL KANNAN
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- PUTHIYEDUTHU KUNNUMMAL CHATHU
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KUNIYIL KANNAN
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- KUNIYIL KANNAN
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- PUTHIYEDUTHU KUNNUMMAL GOPALAN
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Commission report filed by Adv. V. Lathesh.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Krishnakumar. K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Partition and separate possession of properties allotted to each petitioner and respondent.
Evidence:
As per the commission report dated 17.03.2025 a final decree is passed as follows: Plot D in Ext.C1 to C9 plan and plot B in Ext.C8 plan is allotted to the share of 1st petitioner and is entitled to get partition and separate possession over the same.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This document contains the findings of the Advocate Commissioner regarding the partition of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Surveyor plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
These plans detail the division of property as per the preliminary decree.
Reference:
Ext.C1 to C9
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between MEETHALE PALOLLATHIL KANNAN et al vs KUNIYIL KANNAN et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between MEETHALE PALOLLATHIL KANNAN et al vs KUNIYIL KANNAN et al regarding partition of property