Case Summary
Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji is the plaintiff, who claims ownership of a property and seeks protection against trespass by the defendants, Shyni, Akshaya, and Arjun. The defendants did not appear in court, resulting in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has established a case in his favor as the defendants did not appear in court, leaving the plaintiff's claims unchallenged.
The plaintiff has established a case in his favor as the defendants did not appear in court, leaving the plaintiff's claims unchallenged.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff has established a case in his favor as the defendants did not appear in court, leaving the plaintiff's claims unchallenged.
The plaintiff has established a case in his favor as the defendants did not appear in court, leaving the plaintiff's claims unchallenged.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit, documents and commission report the plaintiff has established a case in his favour.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shyni
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akshaya
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arjun
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Assignment Deed No. 1139/1977, Assignment Deed No. 104/2016, Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Officer, Chekkiad to Ammad.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Arun Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants, their men, agents and workers are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's claim to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Basic Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the plaintiff's payment of tax on the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This report provides evidence regarding the state of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commissioner’s Plan
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
This plan visualizes the property in question, aiding in the judgment.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji vs Shyni et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji vs Shyni et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction