RPIA. No. 21/2024 in OS. No. 50/2022

Case between THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI vs KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER regarding restoration of dismissed suit

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM

Judge

Sri. Yadukrishnan.B

Order Date

2025-03-27

Duration

approximately-5 months

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI, seeks to restore a suit that was dismissed for default. The respondent, KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER, opposes the petition claiming lack of bonafides and absence of medical evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The petition to restore the suit was dismissed by the court due to lack of bonafides and insufficient cause.

Key Reasoning:
The petition was filed without bonafides and no medical records were presented to substantiate the petitioner's claims.

Why Defendant Won:
The petition was filed without bonafides and no medical records were presented to substantiate the petitioner's claims.

Supporting Evidence

The court noted that no medical records were produced by the petitioner to substantiate his contention.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RPIA is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI
Party Age: 39
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER
Party Age: 34

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. V. G. Niran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. A. Sanjeev
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The petition to restore the suit was filed but was dismissed.

Evidence:

Hence, the petition is filed without bonafides and lack of sufficient cause. Hence, it is only to be dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification