Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. No. 138/2022 — Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1125/2024
Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leena Sham has filed a suit against YouTube and her daughter, Sharikka Sham, seeking a permanent injunction to remove a video uploaded by her deceased son. The video is claimed to violate her privacy and has caused distress to the family after the son's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 626 /2022
Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Aseeb, a senior citizen, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing his access to a pathway that he claims is essential for ingress and egress to his property. The defendants, relatives of the plaintiff, contest the existence of the claimed pathway and the plaintiff's rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 995 / 2019
Case between Suresh Babu T vs Kiran M B et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Suresh Babu T, filed a suit against Kiran M B and Grace Cheriyan for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent his forcible eviction from a leased property. The plaintiff claims he invested significantly in his business and fears illegal dispossession by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 571 / 2020
Case between M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP, filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, seeking protection against eviction and service disruption. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent during the COVID-19 pandemic and the plaintiff's apprehension of unlawful eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 244 / 2023
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are members of the Youth Wing of 'Lok Tantric Janata Dal', for obstructing access to the plaintiffs' development project in Ernakulam. The defendants staged protests claiming illegal activities by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 563/2025
Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.
Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 5 41/2019
Case between Varghese P Itoop vs Alliance residency owner's association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Varghese P Itoop, is the owner of two commercial shop rooms and is involved in a dispute with the Alliance residency owner's association regarding the unauthorized removal of hoardings placed on his property. The association contends that the plaintiff violated their bye-laws, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1210/2017
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
Purushan O K filed a suit against Soman and others seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions related to a property dispute involving the demolition of a compound wall and encroachment issues. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and seeks to prevent further damage by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 690/2018
Case between New Town Heights, Kakkanad Condominium, Owners Welfare Society vs M/s DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the New Town Heights Owners Welfare Society seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. and others regarding the exclusive use of an internal road within the apartment complex. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are attempting to convert the internal road into a public pathway, violating assurances made to the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1184/2020
Case between Josemon George vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and injunction
Josemon George, the plaintiff, filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding alleged illegal hikes in rent for a shop room leased to him. The plaintiff claims that the defendant violated the terms of the lease agreement by unilaterally increasing the rent.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 920/2020
Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, owners and residents of house plots in the Divine Nagar housing colony, seek a declaration that only they have the right to use internal roads constructed in the colony. They contend that the defendants, who reside in the adjoining area, are attempting to gain access to these roads. The case involves issues around property rights and access to shared spaces.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 661/2024
Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 182/2024
Case between Travancore Credits vs C.T. Ravi et al regarding suit dismissal
Travancore Credits filed a suit against C.T. Ravi and Manju Ravi. The suit was not pressed and subsequently dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 290/2023
Case between M/s. National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Trialliance Global Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit dismissal
The plaintiffs, M/s. National Insurance Company Ltd. and M/s. Agappe Diagnostics Limited, filed a suit against the defendants, Trialliance Global Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s. Ramesh Roadlines. The suit was dismissed as not pressed on 21.2.2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 220/2019
Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. vs Silja T.D., Babith Elias regarding dismissal of suit.
KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition against Silja T.D. and Babith Elias. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed and allowed the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 312/2017
Case between Sujatha Jayaraj vs Babu Jayaraj et al regarding partition and injunction
Sujatha Jayaraj filed a suit against her brother Babu Jayaraj and the Aluva Urban Co-operative Bank seeking partition and injunction regarding property inherited from their parents. The case involves allegations of fraud concerning a power of attorney and the mortgaging of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 351/2024
Case between M/s. Keram Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Athen Enterprises regarding settlement of claim
M/s. Keram Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against M/s Athen Enterprises and its managing partner regarding a financial claim. The matter was settled, and the court recorded that the entire amount was paid.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 259/2024
Case between Karakkattu Finance vs Ancy Rajeev regarding suit not pressed.
Karakkattu Finance, represented by K.P. Geevarghese, filed a suit against Ancy Rajeev. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 123/2018
Case between Mariya Maniyan et al vs Thankamma Kurumban et al regarding mediation agreement and preliminary decree
The plaintiffs, consisting of several housewives and a coolie, filed a suit against the defendants, who are also housewives and a coolie, regarding a mediation agreement. The court accepted the mediation agreement and passed a preliminary decree.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 13/2025
Case between M/S Merris Food Industries vs Ribinshad E.M regarding suit dismissal.
M/S Merris Food Industries filed a suit against Ribinshad E.M. The court found that the suit was not pressed and dismissed it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 39/2019
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Nishad M.M., Najeeba Nishad, Ibrahamkutty M.M. regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd, is seeking the recovery of a loan amount from the defendants. The defendants defaulted on the loan repayments despite being served with legal notices.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 170/2012
Case between Varghese @ Geevarghese vs George Paul et al regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff, Varghese @ Geevarghese, did not appear in court to present evidence, while the defendants were present. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 374/2023
Case between Anilkumar E. A et al vs Vijayan E. N et al regarding declaration and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, who are the legal heirs of late Ayyappankutty, seek a declaration that a draft partition deed represents a binding agreement among the parties. The defendants, also legal heirs, initially agreed to the claims but later refused to complete registration formalities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.203/2021
Case between M/s Royal Laminates vs M/s City Aluminum Traders regarding dismissal of suit
The case involves M/s Royal Laminates as the plaintiff and M/s City Aluminum Traders as the defendant. The plaintiff's suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.06/2025
Case between M/s. ECOVIZ vs Grand Electricals and Electricals regarding suit rejection
The plaintiff, M/s. ECOVIZ, was represented by its manager, Yadhukrishnan A. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to pay the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.15/2019
Case between M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises et al vs Shibu P Paul et al regarding recovery of money
M/s. Chaithanya Enterprises filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 3,24,000 from the defendants for defaulting on payments related to a chit fund. The defendants denied the claims, alleging forgery of documents and lack of authority of the plaintiffs to conduct such business.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.301/2023
Case between Fr. Paul Issac vs Kerala Government et al regarding dismissal of suit
Fr. Paul Issac is the plaintiff in this case against the Kerala Government and other government officials. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.126/2025
Case between Deepak Peter vs My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association et al regarding injunction
Deepak Peter is the plaintiff seeking an ad-interim injunction against My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association and its secretary, Nandakumar Menon. The case concerns a dispute over the selling and transferring of property without proper authorization.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.410/2015
Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a property he received through a settlement deed and seeks relief against Kochumon @ Santhosh and others for boundary fixation and injunction to prevent trespassing. The defendants contend that there is already an existing boundary and allege that the plaintiff has encroached on their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 539/1984
Case between Sankaran Nair et al vs Kalukurumban et al regarding execution of decree related to property obstruction
The case involves decree holders Sankaran Nair, Sarojini Amma, Subhadra, and Ambika seeking to execute a decree for the removal of unlawful obstructions on their property. The judgment debtors include Kalukurumban and others, who have allegedly hindered execution of the court's order.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.327/2024
Case between M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd vs Renju Raju et al regarding realization of money.
The plaintiff, M/s. Matrix Finbiz Pvt. Ltd, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on repayments. The defendants have paid only six installments of a loan agreement for Rs. 50,000.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.38/2019
Case between M/s.Matrix Finbiz Pvt.Ltd vs Joly Paulose et al regarding Execution Petition
This case involves an execution petition filed by M/s.Matrix Finbiz Pvt.Ltd against Joly Paulose and others. The court has closed the execution petition after being satisfied with the circumstances.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 361/2015
Case between S.M.L.Finance Limited vs Aneer et al regarding Lift the attachment
S.M.L.Finance Limited filed a petition to lift the attachment in the ongoing case against Aneer and Fousiya. The court allowed the petition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.298/2019
Case between Capital Finserve Ltd. vs Akhil Varghese, Blessy Sabu M S, Binu Mathai regarding court fee remittance
Capital Finserve Ltd. filed a suit against Akhil Varghese, Blessy Sabu M S, and Binu Mathai concerning the non-remittance of balance court fees. The suit was ultimately rejected by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.457/2019
Case between M.P Roy vs Viju Kumar et al regarding rejection of suit under CPC.
M.P Roy filed a suit against multiple defendants including Viju Kumar and the State of Kerala. The court ultimately rejected the suit due to a failure to remit BCF.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.211/2019
Case between Lousy vs M/s. Kaula Edible Oil Private Limited regarding court fee remittance
The plaintiff, Lousy, filed a suit against M/s. Kaula Edible Oil Private Limited. The court ruled that the suit was rejected due to non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.66/2015
Case between Annamma Yona et al vs Lissy Pappachan et al regarding partition of property.
This case involves a dispute over the partition of properties among the plaintiffs and defendants, who are family members. The court examined claims regarding a will made by the deceased first plaintiff and issues of ownership over several properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won