Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.457/2019

Case between M.P Roy vs Viju Kumar et al regarding rejection of suit under CPC.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-19
Duration
Case Code No.
457
Case Closed
Sat, 07/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M.P Roy filed a suit against multiple defendants including Viju Kumar and the State of Kerala. The court ultimately rejected the suit due to a failure to remit BCF.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by M.P Roy was rejected by the court due to non-remittance of BCF. This decision was pronounced in open court on the same day.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by M.P Roy was rejected by the court due to non-remittance of BCF. This decision was pronounced in open court on the same day.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC due to procedural non-compliance.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC due to procedural non-compliance.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC due to procedural non-compliance.

Judgment Evidence:

Since BCF not remitted. Suit rejected U/o 7 Rule 11 of CPC.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M.P Roy
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viju Kumar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. M.G. Kunhu
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. M.G. Varghese
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala State Pollution Control Board
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajan Puthenveetil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajendren K.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Binla T. Thampi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sunilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.A Shemeer
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.A. Bejoykumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.T.Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nazil Muhammed
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to BCF not remitted.
Evidence:
Since BCF not remitted. Suit rejected U/o 7 Rule 11 of CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
Sat, 07/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Matrix finbiz Pvt. Ltd. vs Sunil Johny et al regarding refund of court fee
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. vs Wilson T. D. et al regarding a civil suit
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Suresh A. vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. et al regarding Civil Suit
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Deepak Peter vs My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Paul Issac vs Kerala Government et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won