Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.235/2025

Case between Matrix finbiz Pvt. Ltd. vs Sunil Johny et al regarding refund of court fee

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
Case Code No.
235
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Matrix finbiz Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against Sunil Johny and others regarding the refund of court fees. The case was finally heard and a compromise was reached.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the application for compromise and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee as per rule
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application for compromise and decreed the suit in terms of the compromise agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The compromise was allowed, leading to a decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The compromise was allowed, leading to a decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The court stated that IA 3/25 filed for compromise was allowed, thus leading to the suit being decreed in terms of the compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

IA 3/25 allowed. Suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Matrix finbiz Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sunil Johny
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soumya Sunil
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuriakose K. K
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blesson Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bastin P. S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anu Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
IA 3/25 allowed. Suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. vs Wilson T. D. et al regarding a civil suit
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Suresh A. vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. et al regarding Civil Suit
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M.P Roy vs Viju Kumar et al regarding rejection of suit under CPC.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Deepak Peter vs My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Paul Issac vs Kerala Government et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won