Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.126/2025

Case between Deepak Peter vs My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-06-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Deepak Peter is the plaintiff seeking an ad-interim injunction against My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association and its secretary, Nandakumar Menon. The case concerns a dispute over the selling and transferring of property without proper authorization.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an ad-interim injunction order to the plaintiff, restraining the second respondent from selling or transferring property without proper resolution from the association's general body until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining the second respondent from selling or transferring property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made a prima facie case, and delay in notice issuance could defeat the purpose of the injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the 2nd respondent from in any manner selling, leasing, transferring, alienating, or otherwise encumbering any part of the A schedule property until further orders.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Deepak Peter (47 years years) Flat No.4D, Royal Enclave East, Elammana Jetty, Ambili Nagar, Trippunithura P O, Thripunithura, Ernakulam District

Defendants

My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association (Age not specified years) Chembarakky, Ponjassery P O, Ernakulam District – 683 547 Nandakumar Menon (63 years years) Sreepushpam, Pandavath Road, Maradu P O, Maradu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District – 682304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the 2nd respondent from in any manner selling, leasing, transferring, alienating, or otherwise encumbering any part of the A schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction order is passed restraining the 2nd respondent from in any manner selling, leasing, transferring, alienating, or otherwise encumbering any part of the A schedule property, including the land and apartment belonging to the First Defendant Association (MCAOWA), without due authorization and resolution of the General Body of the Association until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases