Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.12/2020

Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. vs Wilson T. D. et al regarding a civil suit

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-23
Duration
Case Code No.
12
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against Wilson T. D. and Molly Wilson regarding a legal dispute. The court has made a decision to reject the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. was rejected by the court. The ruling was made in accordance with legal procedural rules.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. was rejected by the court. The ruling was made in accordance with legal procedural rules.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected under Order 7, rule 11.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected under Order 7, rule 11.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the suit did not meet the necessary legal standards for proceeding under the stipulated procedural rules.

Judgment Evidence:

J U D G E M E N T BCF not remit. Suit rejected under Order.7, rule 11. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 23th day of September, 2025.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Wilson T. D.
Party Age
51
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Molly Wilson
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. R. Gayathri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Basi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P. G. Dileepkumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected based on Order 7, rule 11.
Evidence:
Suit rejected under Order.7, rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Matrix finbiz Pvt. Ltd. vs Sunil Johny et al regarding refund of court fee
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh A. vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. et al regarding Civil Suit
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between M.P Roy vs Viju Kumar et al regarding rejection of suit under CPC.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Deepak Peter vs My Castle Apartments Owners Welfare Association et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Fr. Paul Issac vs Kerala Government et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won