Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 170/2012

Case between Varghese @ Geevarghese vs George Paul et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-03-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Varghese @ Geevarghese, did not appear in court to present evidence, while the defendants were present. As a result, the suit was dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff for evidence presentation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff for evidence presentation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence resulted in the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not turn up to adduce evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varghese @ Geevarghese
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Paul
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu Paul
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mercy John
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Sucy Sunny
Party Age
57
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Lissy Sajeev George
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G. Govinhan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Mathew
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.T. Geevarghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiffs not present. Today posted for trial. Plaintiff did not turn up to adduce evidence. Called absent. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Varghese @ Geevarghese vs George Paul et al regarding suit dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Varghese @ Geevarghese vs George Paul et al regarding suit dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Karakkattu Finance vs Ancy Rajeev regarding suit not pressed.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Keram Oil Mills Pvt. Ltd vs M/s Athen Enterprises regarding settlement of claim
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KASAL INDIA Pvt. Ltd. vs Silja T.D., Babith Elias regarding dismissal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Trialliance Global Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Travancore Credits vs C.T. Ravi et al regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won