Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.298/2019

Case between Capital Finserve Ltd. vs Akhil Varghese, Blessy Sabu M S, Binu Mathai regarding court fee remittance

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Capital Finserve Ltd. filed a suit against Akhil Varghese, Blessy Sabu M S, and Binu Mathai concerning the non-remittance of balance court fees. The suit was ultimately rejected by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the balance court fee was not remitted, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected under order 7 Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Deepa Nair (39 years years) Kattukudiyil House, Rayamangalam Kara, Rayamangalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk, Pin: 683 545

Defendants

Akhil Varghese (25 years years) Madathumpady House, Choorakode Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk – 683 562 Blessy Sabu M S (25 years years) Madthumpady House, Choorakode Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk – 683 562 Binu Mathai (30 years years) Pazhambilly House, Kummanode Kara, Kizhakkambalam Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk – 683 562

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected under order 7 Rule 11 due to balance court fee not remitted.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not remitted. Since, Balance Court Fee not remitted. Suit rejected under order 7 Rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases