Similar Cases
Based on: O.S. No.237/2025 — Case between Lini Mathew, Basil Mathew vs Joy regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.410/2015
Case between Jose vs Kochumon @ Santhosh et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a property he received through a settlement deed and seeks relief against Kochumon @ Santhosh and others for boundary fixation and injunction to prevent trespassing. The defendants contend that there is already an existing boundary and allege that the plaintiff has encroached on their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 259 OF 2019
Case between Ismail P. vs Muhammed P regarding Injunction
Case between Ismail P. and Muhammed P., brothers, about a property dispute involving a house where defendant residing after plaintiff withdrew permission.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 87 / 2024
Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Deepa S Vijayan is seeking an ad-interim injunction against Sundaram Finance Ltd and others. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from further actions regarding the vehicle mentioned in the plaint.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 282/2025
Case between Muhsina P S vs Nizar V H regarding temporary injunction
Muhsina P S filed for a temporary injunction against Nizar V H regarding the business CMAS World Wide which she claims to own. The defendant is allegedly retaining possession of the business while failing to pay the agreed amount.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 312/2017
Case between Sujatha Jayaraj vs Babu Jayaraj et al regarding partition and injunction
Sujatha Jayaraj filed a suit against her brother Babu Jayaraj and the Aluva Urban Co-operative Bank seeking partition and injunction regarding property inherited from their parents. The case involves allegations of fraud concerning a power of attorney and the mortgaging of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O. S. No.272/2019
Case between Kusumavally vs State of Kerala et al regarding Mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kusumavally and her sons, are claiming ownership of a property formerly owned by T. Vijayan, whose rights devolved to them after his death. They seek to challenge a mutation that favored the fifth defendant, claiming they are the rightful owners and that the defendants wrongfully altered the property records.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No.139/2019
Case between Suhara vs Muhammed Salam et al regarding partition and consequential injunction.
Suhara filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction against her siblings and a neighboring property owner regarding ancestral property. The defendants contested the identification and ownership claims over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.275/2025
Case between Krishnamritha V vs Chairperson, College Union et al regarding publication of competition result.
The petitioner, Krishnamritha V, a student, seeks a court order to publish her result for the Kathakali competition in MG University Kalotsavam 2024-25. The petition was filed after she participated in the competition based on a previous injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 330/2025
Case between T F George vs CSML (Cochin Smart Mission Ltd.) et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
T F George, a senior citizen and co-owner of land, filed a petition against CSML and Kochi Municipal Corporation seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction to prevent encroachments on his property during a beautification project. The case involves issues of boundary demarcation and the rights of property owners.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 649/2014
Case between Lohidakshan vs Velappan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Lohidakshan is the plaintiff seeking a boundary fixation and injunction against his brother Velappan and his family. The case involves allegations of attempted encroachment on the plaintiff's property and a counterclaim by the defendants for a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 28/2023
Case between M/s. Gambier International Private Limited vs Darley Peethambaran et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, M/s. Gambier International Private Limited, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from forcefully evicting them from the rented property. The defendants have entered appearance but filed written statements denying the allegations.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 656/2011
Case between Cicily vs The Administrator, M/s Chinamaya Vidyalaya et al regarding fixation of boundary.
The plaintiff, Cicily, is seeking a decree for the fixation of the boundary of her property, which she claims has been obstructed by the defendants. The defendants, including M/s Chinamaya Vidyalaya and others, contest the ownership and possession of the plaintiff over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 660 /20 25
Case between Greenal Joseph vs Century Club regarding attachment before judgment
Greenal Joseph, the plaintiff, seeks a pre-judgment attachment of a fixed deposit held by Century Club. He claims that the Club misled him regarding membership fees and that there are internal disputes affecting his membership status.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 64/2024
Case between Shivan M.V vs M. V Sarojini regarding injunction.
The plaintiff, Shivan M.V, is seeking an injunction against his sister, M. V Sarojini, regarding the use of a pathway that they jointly own. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has been obstructing his ability to use the pathway, which is necessary for access to his property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1099/2019
Case between Antony Varghese vs P.C. Jose regarding fixation of boundary and consequential injunction.
The plaintiffs, Antony Varghese and Aney Antony, are seeking a decree for the fixation of boundaries concerning their joint owned property. The defendant, P.C. Jose, is accused of illegally claiming more land than he actually owns.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 762 /2024
Case between Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al vs Anita James, Corporation of Cochin regarding temporary injunction.
The Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association and its Treasurer are seeking a temporary injunction against Anita James and the Corporation of Cochin. They allege that Anita James has been unlawfully altering the common areas of their apartment building.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1078/2025
Case between Petra Property Development Services Private Limited vs Rajesh Nair regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Petra Property Development Services Private Limited and its Managing Director, Sajo Albin, against Rajesh Nair. The plaintiffs sought a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from trespassing on the property and obstructing their peaceful enjoyment.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1210/2017
Case between Purushan O K vs Soman et al regarding injunction
Purushan O K filed a suit against Soman and others seeking both mandatory and prohibitory injunctions related to a property dispute involving the demolition of a compound wall and encroachment issues. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and seeks to prevent further damage by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 690/2018
Case between New Town Heights, Kakkanad Condominium, Owners Welfare Society vs M/s DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves the New Town Heights Owners Welfare Society seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against DLF Southern Towns Pvt. Ltd. and others regarding the exclusive use of an internal road within the apartment complex. The plaintiff claims that the defendants are attempting to convert the internal road into a public pathway, violating assurances made to the apartment owners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1463/2018
Case between Jose K.A. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and lease terms
Jose K.A. filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority challenging their unilateral increase in rent and security deposit for a leased shop. The plaintiff sought a declaration to enforce the original lease terms which limited rent increases.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 920/2020
Case between V.Thulaseedharan Pillai et al vs Prof. Sourier Sebastian et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, owners and residents of house plots in the Divine Nagar housing colony, seek a declaration that only they have the right to use internal roads constructed in the colony. They contend that the defendants, who reside in the adjoining area, are attempting to gain access to these roads. The case involves issues around property rights and access to shared spaces.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1631/2019
Case between Mary. P.J vs Johny Diselva et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mary. P.J is the plaintiff claiming ownership and seeking an injunction against Johny Diselva and others who she alleges have unlawfully entered her property and disturbed her possession. The defendants claim a right of way based on usage for over 50 years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 661/2024
Case between Janeefer Mariam vs Kerala Film Producers Association regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Janeefer Mariam, alleges that the defendant, Kerala Film Producers Association, attempted to trespass on her property and obstruct her access to a pathway necessary for her property. The case revolves around a dispute regarding access rights to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1502/2019
Case between Gopalakrishnan et al vs Sreedevi et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Gopalakrishnan and Lalitha filed a suit against Sreedevi and others for a declaration of easementary rights and to restrain them from obstructing a pathway they claim to have used for over 75 years. The defendants deny the existence of such a pathway and claim that the plaintiffs have no right to it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 86/2018
Case between Thankappan vs Lakshmanan et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit filed by Thankappan against his brothers and a few other defendants regarding the share of property and bank deposits left by their deceased father, Krishnan. The defendants were accused of attempting to withdraw the bank deposits without the plaintiff's consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 654/2023
Case between M/s Landmark Builders vs M/s Regional Sports Centre regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Landmark Builders, seeks a declaration that it is entitled to nominate 10 persons for the use of the defendant’s facilities for the lifetime of the firm. The defendant, M/s Regional Sports Centre, has made amendments to the membership rules limiting rights which the plaintiff claims violate the original membership agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1183/2023
Case between Jiji vs Jobi Jose et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
Jiji is suing Jobi Jose and Thomas regarding the declaration of ownership of a property and to prevent them from trespassing. Jiji claims that she is the sole heir of her deceased father Thomman, as her mother has been missing for many years.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.332/2024
Case between M/s Olive Builders vs Olive Courtyard Owners Association et al regarding seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, M/s Olive Builders, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Olive Courtyard Owners Association and others, to prevent them from illegally occupying seven unsold car parking slots in the Olive Courtyard Project. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have no legal right to these slots and that their attempted occupation would cause irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 793/2016
Case between Vijayan vs Omana N Mani et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
The case involves a dispute over the right of way pertaining to a pathway used by Vijayan's family to access their property, which the defendants claim to obstruct. The defendants contend that the plaintiff has no legal entitlement to the pathway they have used for decades.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.34 9/2012
Case between Babu et al vs Bhagyalakshmi et al regarding declaration of right of way by easement by prescription and prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including Babu and others, claim a right of way over a pathway used for more than 30 years. The defendants, heirs of Ratnakaran, contest this claim, asserting no existing easement rights.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 1633/2019
Case between Parvathy vs Arun Das et al regarding a dispute over a will and property
The plaintiffs, Parvathy and E.K. Sadanandan, are the widow and son of the deceased Kesavan, respectively. They are contesting the validity of a will claimed by the defendants, who are also children of Kesavan, regarding the distribution of property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.328/2025
Case between K N Abdul Gafoor et al vs K N Fajar et al regarding Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, K N Abdul Gafoor and K N Shamsudheen, are seeking a prohibitory injunction against the defendants, K N Fajar and others, regarding illegal constructions on a jointly owned property. Tensions arose over property rights after the death of family members, leading to this legal dispute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 308/2025
Case between Ahmed Riza Manjalingal et al vs Adeeb Jaleel et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Ahmed Riza Manjalingal and Shahana Moinudheen are seeking a temporary injunction against Adeeb Jaleel and Omar Jaleel concerning their sports venture. They claim wrongful eviction attempts and illegal entry by the defendants after investments in property and construction of sports facilities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 281/2025
Case between C A Shylan vs Shajan Antony @ Raphael regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
C A Shylan, the plaintiff and younger brother of the respondent, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Shajan Antony @ Raphael, who allegedly obstructed him from constructing a gate on a pathway. The case arises from a previous ruling concerning easement rights.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 167/2025
Case between Abdul Samad vs P.M.Mirsad et al regarding interim injunction.
Abdul Samad, the plaintiff, is seeking an interim injunction against P.M.Mirsad and others regarding a property dispute. The case revolves around allegations of illegal construction over a pathway claimed by the plaintiff as a public access route.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 503 /2018
Case between Sharmila @ Sharmi vs Vinsa Paul et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, Sharmila @ Sharmi, is seeking a partition of property that she claims to co-own with the defendants, who are her late husband's family members. The defendants argue that the plaintiff relinquished her rights to the property and have filed a written statement contesting her claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No . 82/2024
Case between Harish Kumar Pranlal vs Amit Chhabani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Harish Kumar Pranlal, is in a dispute with his son, daughter-in-law, and grandson regarding his right to possess his property. The case involves threats from the defendants to dispossess the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1388/2016
Case between Sathyabhama vs Jeevan and Rintu Jeevan regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Sathyabhama, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a pathway that has been used for over 25 years to access her property. The defendants, Jeevan and Rintu Jeevan, contest this claim, asserting that the plaintiff does not have an easement right over the pathway due to its encroachment by their constructed wall.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 315/2025
Case between Niyas Abdul Rahiman vs Jiji John regarding interim injunction
The plaintiff, Niyas Abdul Rahiman, seeks an interim injunction against the defendant, Jiji John, to prevent him from unlawfully fishing and trespassing on property that the plaintiff claims ownership of. The defendant argues that he has traditional fishing rights over the area in question.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 449/2025
Case between Subish K.S vs Sujith K.S regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Subish K.S filed a petition against his brother Sujith K.S for a temporary prohibitory injunction regarding a residential property that belonged to their late father. The case involves issues of possession and ownership rights of the property following the father's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 75/2024
Case between Jayanthilal P.M. et al vs Jainy Suresh et al regarding partition of property
This case involves a dispute over the partition of property originally belonging to Mr. P.G. Muraleedharan. The plaintiff Jayanthilal P.M. and the defendants, who are his relatives, seek a formal division of their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 184/2019
Case between Nandhan @ Nandakumar vs Sunitha Santhosh et al regarding Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction
Nandhan @ Nandakumar is the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction against Sunitha Santhosh and others regarding a pathway that he claims to have used continuously for over 12 years. The defendants argue that the plaintiff has no legal right over the pathway and that they are the true owners of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1406 / 2019
Case between Maneesh Sasidharan vs Daimler Financial Services India Pvt Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Maneesh Sasidharan, the managing partner of Salabham Travels, filed a suit against Daimler Financial Services India Pvt Ltd. and others for permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent illegal repossession of a vehicle. The plaintiff alleges intimidation and coercion during a loan transaction for the vehicle, fearing unlawful repossession attempts.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won